Search by property

From Buddha-Nature

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "PosYogaMadhyaNotes" with value "Both Yogacara and Nihsvabhavavāda are considered as Madhyamaka". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 11 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

    • People/Dol po pa  + (Dolpopa has a unique view on this issue asDolpopa has a unique view on this issue as Wangchuk points out:</br>*"Dölpopa argues the following: (1) Cittamātra is categorized into Conventional Cittamātra (''kun rdzob pa'i sems tsam'') and Ultimate Cittamātra (''don dam pa'i sems tsam''); (2) Cittamātra must not be conflated with Vijnānavāda; (3) Madhyamaka is grouped into Madyamaka without Appearance (''snang med dbu ma'') and Madhyamaka with Appearance (''snang bcas dbu ma''). His Mahäyäna doxography differs significantly from that of other fourteenth-century Tibetan scholars." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 47.</br></br>*It seems that the simple answer is that Dolpopa espoused Great Madhyamaka (''dbu ma chen mo'') or Madhyamaka with Appearance (''snang bcas dbu ma''), which is equivalent to Ultimate Cittamātra (''don dam pa'i sems tsam''). See [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', pp. 49-50.ratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', pp. 49-50.)
    • People/Bu ston rin chen grub  + (In line with his assertion that these teacIn line with his assertion that these teachings are merely provisional he claims, "The general basis of intention of the teachings on buddha nature is the ālaya-consciousness, which refers to the sheer cause of buddhahood." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 868.When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 868.)
    • People/Btsan kha bo che  + (Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls NgKarl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (''bshad pa’i bka’ babs'') and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (''sgrub pa’i bka’ babs''), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124.ouds Part]]'', p. 124.)
    • Texts/Springs yig bdud rtsi'i thig le  + (Mostly likely emptiness but not clear.)
    • People/Tsong kha pa  + (Note that Wangchuk maintains that he develNote that Wangchuk maintains that he developed this certainty later in his career. </br>*He quotes his ''Golden Rosary of Excellent Exposition'' as stating that the Mind-Only presentation of buddha-nature as, "the viewpoint explicated in the ''Uttaratantra''." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 90.</br>*Though he later quotes his presumably final stance as: "In his ''Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka'', Tsongkhapa clearly states, "The great master Asaṅga also did not explain the ''Uttaratantra'' according to the Cittamātra School, rather he explicated it according to the Madhyamaka School." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 93.he Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 93.)
    • People/Jñānaśrīmitra  + (Sākāravāda to be specific.)
    • Texts/Zab lam khrid kyi man ngag 'phrad tshad rang grol  + (The text considers emptiness as an aspect of buddha-nature.)
    • People/Ratnākaraśānti  + (There are apparently different takes on thThere are apparently different takes on this issue, particularly whether he was a Yogācāran who accepted Madhyamaka or whether he was a Mādhyamika who accepted Yogācāra:</br>#Nirākāra Vijñānavāda, though as Kano states: "he defines the Madhyamaka position in accordance with the ''Madhyāntavibhāga's'', description of the “middle way.” Indeed, he repeats throughout his works that the doctrine of the Mādhyamikas and that of the Yogācāras are completely compatible." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 73.</br>#"In sum, in his works Ratnākaraśānti generally sees himself as a Mādhyamika, but one who integrates many essential elements of Yogācāra and the teachings on buddha nature, such as emphasizing the soteriologically crucial role of mind’s nature being nondual lucid self-awareness—the tathāgata heart—which is only obscured by adventitious stains and needs to be experienced in an unmediated manner as what it truly is." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 61..)
    • People/Rta nag rin chen ye shes  + (Though this is perhaps up for debate, he cThough this is perhaps up for debate, he certainly sides with the works of Maitreya and the last wheel sūtras over those of the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' and the associated Madhyamaka works, which he labels as a "nihilistic emptiness (''chad pa'i stong pa nyid''). See [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 36.Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 36.)
    • People/Abhayākara  + ([[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 109; he cites Ruegg for this, and agrees.)