How did buddha-nature thought develop?: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The theory of buddha-nature (''tathāgatagarbha'', for the most part)--that all sentient beings somehow possess the innate buddhahood or potential to become buddhas and (somet...") |
m (JeremiP moved page How did buddha-nature thought develop in Tibet? to How did buddha-nature thought develop?) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The theory of buddha-nature (''tathāgatagarbha'', for the most part)--that all sentient beings somehow possess the innate buddhahood or potential to become buddhas | The theory of buddha-nature (''tathāgatagarbha'', for the most part)--that all sentient beings somehow possess the innate buddhahood or potential to become buddhas--seems to have appeared in India as early as the Second Century CE before spreading to China and Tibet and beyond. The concept seems to have initially been taught as a means of inspiration, offered in response to the seeming nihilism of Madhyamaka emptiness-theory, as well as to the Yogācāra doctrine of Three Natures which restricted buddhahood to only a select few. For this reason scholars mostly agree that buddha-nature theory developed alongside--rather than part of--the two main Indian Mayāyāna Buddhist doctrinal schools, and great thinkers of each have both embraced it and rejected elements of the teaching. Buddha-nature was taught in a handful of early Mahāyāna sūtras such as the ''Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra'' and the ''Śrīmālādevīsūtra'', and systematized first in the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'', a treatise composed before the year 498 (when it was brought to China). From there it appears to have permeated most Buddhist schools, becoming a significant topic of debate among them. |
Latest revision as of 09:26, 11 October 2018
The theory of buddha-nature (tathāgatagarbha, for the most part)--that all sentient beings somehow possess the innate buddhahood or potential to become buddhas--seems to have appeared in India as early as the Second Century CE before spreading to China and Tibet and beyond. The concept seems to have initially been taught as a means of inspiration, offered in response to the seeming nihilism of Madhyamaka emptiness-theory, as well as to the Yogācāra doctrine of Three Natures which restricted buddhahood to only a select few. For this reason scholars mostly agree that buddha-nature theory developed alongside--rather than part of--the two main Indian Mayāyāna Buddhist doctrinal schools, and great thinkers of each have both embraced it and rejected elements of the teaching. Buddha-nature was taught in a handful of early Mahāyāna sūtras such as the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra and the Śrīmālādevīsūtra, and systematized first in the Ratnagotravibhāga, a treatise composed before the year 498 (when it was brought to China). From there it appears to have permeated most Buddhist schools, becoming a significant topic of debate among them.