Discover: Difference between revisions

From Buddha-Nature
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker))
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker))
 
(998 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="fullpage">
{{HideFirstHeading}}{{#widget:ContainerWidth|px=1200}}__NOTOC__
<div class="section">
 
<div class="fp-bg tsadra-buddha-back"></div>
 
<div class="container">
 
<div class="row m-0">
 
<div class="col-lg-8 offset-lg-2 p-5 rounded depth-3" style="background: rgba(255, 252, 241, .85);">
<div class="text-center my-3 my-md-4 my-lg-5">
<div class="screen-heading text-center">Your Buddha-Nature</div>
<div class="d-inline-block font-serif small-caps tsdwiki-border-b-redfade line10" style="font-size: 3.5rem;">Discover</div>
<div class="screen-text">Buddha-nature is the teaching that all people are fundamentally good. We have no "original sin" or any sort of imperfection that we need to rid ourselves of or transform. All our suffering and failings are actually the result of ignorance. They are caused by our ego, generated by mistaken perceptions of our experiences and the world around us. On examination one finds that all conceptual dualities—that of self and other chief among them—are without solid basis. Recognizing this reality not only frees us from our own petty concerns, it also opens us up to a compassion through which we are liberated.</div>
</div>
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="row tsdwiki-depth-1 offwhite-bg rounded my-5 overflow-hidden">
<div class="col-md-4 p-0">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100
|src={{filepath:Home-Page-Front-Buddha-Banner-bright-grey.jpg|800}}
|imageposition=50% 50%
|styles=
|imageSource=
}}</div>
<div class="col-md-8 text-article p-3 p-md-4 p-lg-5">
<div class="h1 mt-0 pt-0 border-bottom-rightfade">Our Buddha-Nature</div>
 
<p class="drop-cap">Buddha-nature is the capacity for enlightenment and freedom present in every being, a fundamental core of goodness, wisdom, and compassion that is hidden by clouds of ignorance—so hidden in fact that we might never even suspect its presence. It is like the sun that continues to shine regardless of the clouds that may cover it. By clearing away those clouds of greed, anger, and selfishness we uncover a state of perfection that is, and always has been, our own true nature.</p>
 
Although it may be difficult to completely overcome all our limitations and clear away those clouds, the fact that our nature is fundamentally the same as a buddha's is what makes the whole path to enlightenment possible. We already have everything we need to begin walking a path that leads to true happiness. We simply need to have confidence in the presence of our buddha-nature and the courage to begin the journey to uncover it.
</div>
</div>
 
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="row tsdwiki-depth-1 offwhite-bg rounded my-5 overflow-hidden">
<div class="col-md-8 text-article p-3 p-md-4 p-lg-5">
<div class="h1 mt-0 pt-0 border-bottom-rightfade">What Then?</div>
 
<p class="drop-cap">Everyone has buddha-nature. The only difference between us and an enlightened being such as a buddha is that a buddha recognizes this nature and the rest of us do not. The goal of Buddhist practice is to allow our true nature to shine forth. We may not be perfect buddhas yet, but we have the capacity to develop wisdom and compassion and free ourselves from selfishness, greed, and hatred. Buddhist teachings and practices aim at revealing our true nature by cultivating the proper outlook and behavior, and by ceasing the negative habits that cause dissatisfaction and suffering. This website is focused on the teachings associated with traditions of training that lead to real liberation, and we hope that you can learn a great deal from reading and watching the content here. You can start by reading and watching the following introductory materials.</p>
 
</div>
<div class="col-md-4 p-0">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100
|src={{filepath:Man_meditating_reduced_mono.png|800}}
|imageposition=50% 50%
|styles=
|imageSource=
}}</div>
</div>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h1>What is Buddha-Nature?</h1>
 
<div class="text-article px-3 px-md-4">
 
<h2 class="text-center border-0 position-relative py-lg-5">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100 position-absolute opac-80
|src={{filepath:Buddha_statues_Sri_Lanka_1920x1080-faded.jpg|1200}}
|imageposition=50% 20%
|styles=top: 0px;
|imageSource=
}}
<div class="position-relative my-lg-5">What is Buddha-Nature?</div>
</h2>
 
<p class="drop-cap">All Buddhist traditions claim that the nature of our mind is luminous—that is to say, the natural state of our mind is free, open, and pure awareness. Buddha-nature refers to this pure, natural, and luminous state of our consciousness which is free from any duality or defilement. All beings are said to possess buddha-nature, which is what makes enlightenment possible. The myriad Buddhist practices, from quiet sitting meditation to visualization of deities, chanting, and yogic endeavors, are diverse methods to shake off the temporary cloud-like obscurations veiling the sun of one's own nature.</p>
 
 
<div class="border-tb-redfade my-4 py-3 d-flex justify-content-center flex-wrap sun-1-bg w-100">
{{RelatedButton
|link=Articles/Everything_Is_Buddhanature
|imagefile=Blacker, Melissa Myozen.jpg
|text=Everything Is Buddhanature
|label=Related Article
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
{{RelatedButton
|link=Articles/Evidence_of_our_buddha-nature
|imagefile=Gyatrul Rinpoche2.png
|text=Evidence of our buddha-nature
|label=Related Article
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
</div>
 
Beyond the sun always shining behind the clouds, two other metaphors are traditionally used to describe buddha-nature: a golden statue encased in muck and the seed of a mango tree. The first suggests that our buddha-nature is already perfect and only needs to be revealed in order to manifest our enlightenment. The second presents buddha-nature as a potential that must be cultivated in order to attain enlightenment. A third, less common interpretation is that we acquire buddha-nature at a certain stage of spiritual accomplishment, like a fruiting tree. These three models—disclosure, transformation, and obtainment—are used by different traditions to define buddha-nature and describe the methods to fully actualize enlightenment.
 
Not all Buddhist traditions are comfortable with language that describes buddha-nature as the mind's fundamental state, suspecting that such descriptions promote the idea that buddha-nature is some kind of abiding individual self. The Buddha, of course, famously taught that such an idea of a self is wrong, a delusion we create but which causes us suffering. However, buddha-nature is not taught as an individual self but more like the natural characteristic of mind, akin to wet being the natural characteristic of water. Some Buddhist philosophers have rejected such a description of buddha-nature. They maintain that ultimate reality cannot be described by language because language is limited by dualism (self and other, good and bad, and so forth), whereas the ultimate is nondual. Such philosophers will only say what the ultimate is not—not permanent, not individualistic, not ignorant, and so forth. The limitations of such a position for teaching about experience are obvious; how can one describe anything without language? Still others have argued that buddha-nature is misguided because it undermines the drive to improve ourselves, as though we must think of ourselves as bereft of good qualities in order to become better people. On these pages and the other materials linked here, you will find details about fascinating debates from these different perspectives.  
 
In Indian and Tibetan traditions, philosophers have also debated whether buddha-nature is a teaching that one should take literally or if it was meant to promote and encourage the student to move in the right direction. Some scriptures support the interpretation that buddha-nature is a provisional teaching given to those discouraged by the daunting project of attaining enlightenment. Other sources, however, present buddha-nature as a definitive teaching and take the position that the mind's natural luminosity is self-evident and need not be explained as a rhetorical trick. They maintain that if the mind were not already enlightened by nature, then enlightenment would have to be produced. This would contradict the definition of ultimate reality—that is, nirvāṇa—as unproduced and unconditioned.
 
<div class="my-4 mx-lg-5">{{InsertLazyYoutube|DKmkQkzVqJ8}}</div>
 
<div class="border-top-redfade mt-4 pt-4 row">
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Karmapa_on_The_Nature_of_All_Beings]]
|classes=col-sm-6 px-2
|target=_blank
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Dealing_with_Depression:_Interview_with_Jetsunma_Tenzin_Palmo_on_Study_Buddhism]]
|classes=col-sm-6 px-2
|target=_blank
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Discovering_Buddha_Nature:_Talk_by_Yongey_Mingyur_Rinpoche]]
|classes=col-sm-6 px-2
|target=_blank
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Articles/Buddhanature:_You're_Perfect_As_You_Are]]
|classes=col-sm-6 px-2
|target=_blank
}}
</div>
 
</div>
 
<h1>The Questions</h1>
 
<div class="text-article px-3 px-md-4">
 
<h2 class="text-center border-0 position-relative py-lg-5">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100 position-absolute opac-80
|src={{filepath:Buddha_and_Disciples_-_Gradient_Overlay.jpg|1200}}
|imageposition=50% 40%
|styles=top: 0px;
|imageSource=
}}
<div class="position-relative my-lg-5">The Questions</div>
</h2>
 
<p class="drop-cap">One of the most common questions about buddha-nature is whether it is the same as or similar to the Christian or Hindu notions of a soul. It is not. Buddha-nature is not an individual entity—there are not separate buddha-natures in each being. Christianity teaches that each person's soul exists independently and will survive that person's death. There is plenty of debate across traditions, but in general the soul is said to be fundamentally polluted by Original Sin and that it requires God's intervention to be saved. The Hindu notion of ''ātman'' is similarly understood to be real, but only in the sense of partaking in a universal divine presence called ''Brahman''; the individuality of the ātman is believed to be illusory.</p>
 
Buddha-nature, in contrast to both of these ideas, is neither individualistic nor a manifestation of a divine presence. Rather, it is the basic faculty of awareness—a natural luminosity that is unchanged no matter how ignorant or benighted we are. It is like water that has been muddied—the water is fundamentally clear, and it will return to that state when left to settle—or like a cloudy sky, where the clarity of the sky remains constant even as clouds pass through it. Because buddha-nature is empty of any conditioning, it is fundamentally pure, no different from the enlightened state of a buddha. For that reason, we all have the potential to cast off ignorance and suffering and achieve buddhahood, and we are solely responsible ourselves for doing so. Questions regarding what buddha-nature actually is, as well as several other questions, have been debated by Buddhist scholars from different traditions through the centuries. To learn more, navigate to the [[Questions|Questions page]] and [[Topics|the Topics page]] in the Explore section.
 
 
<div class="border-top-redfade mt-4 pt-3 d-flex justify-content-center">
{{RelatedButton
|link=Questions
|image=https://commons.tsadra.org/images/thumb/c/c0/Buddha_disciples_gold.jpg/320px-Buddha_disciples_gold.jpg
|text=The Questions
|label=Explore more
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
 
<div class="fp-bg practice-back-mono"></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
 
<div class="row" style="height: 100%;">
<h1>The History</h1>
<div class="col-lg-8 offset-lg-2 ">
 
<div class="discover-slide p-5 rounded depth-3">
<div class="text-article px-3 px-md-4">
<div class="screen-heading">What Then?</div>
 
<div class="screen-text">Everyone has the same buddha-nature, even the Buddha. The only difference is that the Buddha recognized his and the rest of us have not. The goal of Buddhist practice is to allow our true nature to shine forth. We may not yet be perfect buddhas, but we will be the moment we cease our commitment to our ego and our suffering. The Buddhist teachings and practices are all dedicated to revealing our true nature through retraining the mind and body, both by cultivating the proper outlook and behavior, and by ceasing the negative habits that cause dissatisfaction and suffering.</div>
<h2 class="text-center border-0 position-relative py-lg-5">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
</div>
|classes=w-100 h-100 position-absolute opac-70
</div>
|src={{filepath:Dewi-poedjawati-bci7HLxYZU0-unsplash.jpg|1200}}
</div>
|imageposition=50% 50%
</div>
|styles=top: 0px;
|imageSource=
}}
<div class="position-relative my-lg-5">The History</div>
</h2>
 
<p class="drop-cap">The seeds of buddha-nature teachings were planted in some of the earliest Buddhist scriptures. Passages such as this one, from the ''Aṅguttaranikāya'' — "Luminous, monks, is this mind, but sometimes it is defiled by adventitious defilements"— suggest a natural state that is only temporarily obscured by the stains of saṃsāra. Buddhism before the rise of the Mahāyāna, however, focused as it was on the long and arduous transformation from delusion and suffering into enlightenment.</p>
 
This changed in the early centuries of the Common Era, when scriptures teaching buddha-nature began to circulate and gain attention. These were the so-called buddha-nature scriptures, such as the ''Tathāgatagarbhasūtra'', the ''Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra'', and the ''Śrīmālādevīsūtra''. Drawing on the Mahāyāna doctrine of the Buddha as a universal principle of enlightened mind, they taught that enlightenment is an essential factor of human existence. Rather than be transformed into a buddha, these scriptures taught, one need only reveal one's true nature to become free.
 
The buddha-nature teachings spread to China starting in the fifth century; there they inspired the composition of the ''Awakening of Faith'' and Chinese doctrines such as original enlightenment and sudden enlightenment, becoming part of the standard doctrine of all East Asian Buddhist traditions. Tibetans knew of buddha-nature theory as early as the seventh century, but the teachings spread widely only in the eleventh century, following the translation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'', a fifth-century Indian treatise. Since then,buddha-nature has been a principal topic of philosophical interpretation, doctrinal debates and spiritual practice in Tibet.
 
</div>
 
<h1>The Texts</h1>
 
<div class="text-article px-3 px-md-4">
 
<h2 class="text-center border-0 position-relative py-lg-5">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100 position-absolute opac-70
|src={{filepath:Pecha-pixabay-faded.jpg|1200}}
|imageposition=50% 50%
|styles=top: 0px;
|imageSource=
}}
<div class="position-relative my-lg-5">The Texts</div>
</h2>
 
<p class="drop-cap">Buddhism has a vast trove of scriptures, known as sūtras and tantras, that are said to be the authentic word of the Buddha. Buddhists revere these books, although they are considered subject to interpretation, and there are an enormous number of commentaries elucidating and expanding on the teachings. The seeds of buddha-nature doctrine are sprinkled throughout this literature. A core group of scriptures that initially taught buddha-nature known as the tathāgatagarbha sūtras date between the second and fourth centuries CE. These include the ''Tathāgatagarbhasūtra'', the ''Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra'', the ''Śrīmālādevīsūtra'', and several others. The famous ''Laṅkāvatārasūtra'' was also important for buddha-nature theory. In East Asia the ''Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna'' (大乗起信論) and the ''Vajrasamādhisūtra'' are the most influential treatises in spreading buddha-nature theory.</p>
 
In Tibetan Buddhism, there exists a great number of writings on buddha-nature, which are either translated from Indic sources or original Tibetan compositions. However, there is a single core text studied in all Tibetan Buddhist lineages and in the current academic study of buddha-nature called ''The Treatise on the Ultimate Continuum'' (''Gyü Lama'' in Tibetan, ''Uttaratantra'' in Sanskrit). Also known as the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'', this text was originally composed in Sanskrit and translated into Tibetan sometime in the eleventh century, and many commentaries on it have been written right up to the present day. It is used as a fundamental source for buddha-nature teachings on this website.
 
In this short video [[Karl Brunnhölzl]], translator of the ''Gyü Lama'' into English, discusses the questions about the origins and authorship of the text.  
 
<div class="my-4 mx-lg-5">{{InsertLazyYoutube|uzRwoCR-85Y}}</div>
 
<div class="d-flex justify-content-lg-center flex-wrap">
{{RelatedButton
|link=Primary_Sources
|image=https://commons.tsadra.org/images/thumb/c/c7/Maitreya_statue.jpg/172px-Maitreya_statue.jpg
|text=On the source texts
|label=Read more
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="slide" data-anchor="BuddhaNature">
<div class="fp-bg buddha-nature-slide-bg"></div>
<div class="container" style="padding: 15vh;">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 offset-lg-2">
<div class="discover-slide p-5 rounded depth-3" style="font-size: 1.2em;">
<div class="h2 mt-0 pt-0">'''What is buddha-nature?'''</div>


<p class="m-0">Buddha-nature is the spark of buddhahood in every sentient being. It is the teaching that all people are fundamentally good and that all of us have the potential to attain the complete realization of buddhahood. Two frequently-used metaphors to describe this universal nature are a golden statue encased in muck and the seed of a mango tree. The first suggests that our buddha-nature is already perfect, and only needs to be revealed in order to manifest our enlightenment. The second presents buddha-nature as a potential that must be cultivated in order to attain enlightenment. A third, less common interpretation is that we somehow produce buddhahood and thus acquire 'buddha-nature' at a certain stage of religious accomplishment. These three models, 'disclosure', 'transformation', and 'production', are used by different traditions to define buddha-nature and describe the methods to fully actualize enlightenment.</p>
</div>
 
<h1>The Traditions</h1>
 
<div class="text-article px-3 px-md-4">
 
<h2 class="text-center border-0 position-relative py-lg-5">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100 position-absolute opac-70
|src={{filepath:Buddha-2.jpg|1200}}
|imageposition=50% 50%
|styles=top: 0px;
|imageSource=
}}
<div class="position-relative my-lg-5">The Traditions</div>
</h2>
 
<p class="drop-cap">The doctrine of buddha-nature—the innate enlightened nature of mind—is found in all Mahāyāna Buddhist traditions, but explaining what that really means differs considerably across traditions.<ref>The doctrine of buddha-nature in its full form was not present in early Buddhism and is not accepted by most contemporary Asian Theravada Buddhist traditions. In mainstream Theravada, consciousness is one of the five aggregates, the conditioned aspects of existence which are left behind upon the attainment of nirvāṇa. The notion of a mind that exists apart from the aggregates, which is primordially pure and somehow innately enlightened, would be heretical to most Theravada Buddhists. As the contemporary Western Theravadin teacher [[Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu]] has written, "The Buddha never advocated attributing an innate nature of any kind to the mind—good, bad, or Buddha." Not only are the buddha-nature teachings not true, he continues, but they hinder one's progress on the path: "If you assume that the mind is basically good, you'll feel capable but will easily get complacent." [https://www.dhammatalks.org/books/Head&HeartTogether/Section0016.html See "Freedom from Buddha Nature," para. 18–19, dhammatalks.org]. This is not a universal view; the Thai Forest tradition that began at the turn of the twentieth century espouses the view that the mind is "luminous" in the sense of being innately pure, nondual awareness, and that it continues to exist in nirvāṇa.</ref> All Mahāyāna traditions also teach that because all phenomena arise in dependence on other phenomena they are empty of any special nature. How to describe that emptiness and what it means for the Buddhist practitioner, however, is a matter of considerable disagreement and often defines key differences between traditions. Whereas Indian Yogācāra masters use positive language to describe the mind and the true nature of reality, in the ancient Indian Madhyamaka school of [[Nāgārjuna]] and his disciples, negative language is used to describe reality. "Because there are no phenomena that are not dependently arisen," Nāgārjuna wrote, "there are no phenomena that are not empty."<ref>''Mūlamadhyamakakārikā'' XXIV, 19</ref> Thus while buddha-nature is generally accepted in Yogācāra, in Madhyamaka it is considered either provisionally (that is, not literally) true or as a synonym for emptiness.</p>
 
Buddha-nature is a central doctrine in most East Asian Buddhist traditions with the ''Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna'', a Chinese composition that introduced the concepts of original enlightenment and actualized enlightenment, as one of the most influential Buddhist scriptures. Original enlightenment refers to the fundamental nature of mind obscured by temporary stains, while the actualised state is that same innately enlightened mind freed of those obscurations. The Tiantai (Tendai in Japan), Huayan (Kegon in Japan), and Chan (Zen in Japan) and their offshoots all accepted buddha-nature, as did the tantric Shingon school in Japan, although they differ in terms of approaches and significance they attribute to these teachings. [[Dōgen]], one of the founders of Japanese Zen, taught that meditation is practiced not to attain enlightenment but to express one's innate enlightenment. This is expressed in the famous Zen proverb "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." That is, if you think that the Buddha is someone or somewhere else, you're wasting your time; destroy that idea and realize your own innate enlightenment. In Pure Land there remains some disagreement, with some sects arguing that ordinary beings do not have buddha-nature but only acquire it upon being saved by the Buddha Amitābha and being born in the Pure Land.
 
Among dominant Tibetan and Himalayan traditions of Nyingma, Sakya, Kagyu, and Geluk, which are better understood as transmission lineages, there is a wide range of understanding and practical application of buddha-nature. Buddha-nature in Tibet is a common topic of debate and discourse, two points being whether buddha-nature teachings are provisional or definitive and whether buddha-nature is simply another word for emptiness or an innate nature with its own qualities. These conversations began in India but took on new life in Tibet through the analytic and meditative traditions of ''[[Ratnagotravibhāga]]'' exegesis. The analytic tradition largely relies on strict Madhyamaka presentations of emptiness and rejects any attempt to describe ultimate reality with positive characteristics. The meditative tradition encompasses a wide body of buddha-nature theory found primarily in the Jonang, Kagyu, and Nyingma traditions, usually, although not always, in some form of a unity of emptiness and luminosity. Great detail can be found on these positions and their counterparts throughout this website.
 
In the emerging Buddhist traditions of America and Europe, most Buddhist follow the tradition they received from Asia while some of them opt for a more eclectic approach to teachings and practices. Almost all of  them embrace buddha-nature as a core tenet, explicitly or otherwise. Among those adopting the eclectic approach, Jack Kornfield, for example, has a teaching series called "Your Buddha Nature" and leads retreats on the topic. Sharon Salzberg uses the practice of loving kindness and mindfulness, through her Metta Hour series, to realise buddha-nature, the highest potential. Perhaps more than any other contemporary Western Buddhist, Joseph Goldstein models the modern Western synthesis of disparate Asian Buddhist traditions. His book ''One Dharma'' unites Tibetan Dzogchen and Zen with the Theravada Vipassanā tradition of the Burmese, Thai, and Bengali teachers that formed the major part of his training. Goldstein puts forward buddha-nature (or its synonyms) as the definition of wisdom in his ''One Dharma'' synthesis. He writes,
"In Buddhism there are many names for ultimate freedom: Buddha-Nature, the Unconditioned, Dharmakaya, the Unborn, the Pure Heart, Mind Essence, Nature of Mind, Ultimate Bodhicitta, Nirvana."<ref>Joseph Goldstein, ''One Dharma: The Emerging Western Buddhism'' (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2002), 4. [https://www.harpercollins.com/9780062026361/one-dharma/ See this book on the publisher's site.]</ref>
 
<references/>
 
</div>
 
<h1>The People</h1>
 
<div class="text-article px-3 px-md-4">
 
<h2 class="text-center border-0 position-relative py-lg-5">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|classes=w-100 h-100 position-absolute opac-70
|src={{filepath:Buddha-statues-china-religion.jpg|1200}}
|imageposition=50% 50%
|styles=top: 0px;
|imageSource=
}}
<div class="position-relative my-lg-5">The People</div>
</h2>


What buddha-nature actually is, and how it can be described accurately, is a major topic in Buddhist philosophy. In general Buddhists employ one of two main approaches to describe reality: positive language which asserts the qualities of enlightenment and buddha-nature, and negative language which attempts to avoid the traps of dualism. From these two approaches come two common definitions of buddha-nature: that it is none other than the natural luminosity of the mind or that it is the universal truth of emptiness. "Emptiness" refers to a theory of radical selflessness, in which all phenomena are understood to lack independent existence. It also refers to a specific way of using language to avoid implying such an existence, in which reality is consistently described by what it is not. The "natural luminosity of mind" is the idea that the fundamental nature of all sentient beings is nondual wisdom, a phenomenon also known as reflexive awareness--awareness that is aware of itself, free of the duality of subject and object that infects all forms of consciousness. Advocates of this view describe buddha-nature as fundamentally real, permanent, and unchanging, and this use of positive language puts it in conflict with emptiness theory, and so has led to centuries of sometimes contentious debates. You will find information about all these fascinating debates on the pages of this website.
<p class="drop-cap">Writings on buddha-nature can be divided into two main categories: those that are said to be the word of the Buddha and those that were composed by the great masters to explain the doctrine. The sūtras discussing buddha-nature are generally attributed to the Buddha although modern scholars date the sūtras in their current form from the beginning of the common era. These works are collectively known as the tathāgatagarbha sūtras and they contain conversations between the Buddha and followers such as Śrīmālādevī and Dhāraṇïśvararāja. They lay out the foundation for buddha-nature philosophy and practice.</p>


Indian and Tibetan philosophers have also debated whether buddha-nature is a definitive teaching--one given by the Buddha to describe things as they are--or a provisional teaching--not true but valuable for encouraging a student to move in the right direction. A famous parable of this sort of teaching from the Lotus Sutra describes a group of children unaware that the building in which they play is burning; their father, unable to convince them to leave, tells them, falsely, that a marvelous chariot is outside the house, which they run to see, thereby surviving the fire. Like the father who tells his children an untruth in order to benefit them, the Buddha is said to have taught many doctrines that are not strictly accurate, but which benefit disciples by encouraging them to get on the path. For many philosophers, the doctrine of buddha-nature is like this--the idea that we possess this spark of enlightenment inspires us to practice, but such a thing cannot be actually said to exist because of the fundamental truth of emptiness. Others, however, take the position that the mind's natural luminosity is self-evident, and need not be explained as a rhetorical trick.  
In course of time, Indian scholars began to produce treatises that systematized the received teachings. The earliest well known historical figure to write about buddha-nature is perhaps [[Nāgārjuna]], who wrote his ''Dharmadhātustava'' and other hymnic writings which takes buddha-nature as the main topic. However, the most influential Indian commentarial writing on buddha-nature is the <em>Ratnagotravibhāga</em>, which became the main scriptural source for buddha-nature theory in Tibet. The Indian and Central Asian traditions, hold that the <em>Ratnagotravibhāga</em> was written by [[Maitreya]]. In the Tibetan tradition, it is believed that the bodhisattva Maitreya revealed the root verses of the treatise to the fourth-century founder of Yogācāra, Ārya [[Asaṅga]], who then composed the prose commentary. It is not clear how the text was transmitted in centuries after Asaṅga but the Tibetan tradition has it that [[Maitrīpa]] rediscovered the text from a stūpa in the 11th century. Subsequent to this, the teaching of the text was passed down to the Kashmiri Pandita [[Sajjana]] taught the text to many people, but two stand out in the annals of history for their influence on the development of Buddhism in Tibet: [[Ngok Lotsāwa]] and [[Tsen Khawoche]]. These two studied around the same time with Sajjana, but returned to Tibet with two very different approaches to the text, which lead to two very different styles of study and practice which still exist today. The text itself was translated into Tibetan by six different teams, including one led by [[Atiśa Dīpaṃkara]] and another by [[Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab]], who worked directly with [[Sajjana]]. Many of the greatest Tibetan philosophers have written commentaries and synopses, including [[Ngok Lotsāwa]], [[Pakpa Lodrö Gyaltsen]], the [[Third Karmapa]], [[Dölpopa]], [[Gyalse Tokme Zangpo]], [[Gyaltsap Je]], [[Bodong Paṇchen]], [[Gö Lotsāwa]], [[Śākya Chokden]], [[Tāranātha]], [[Jamgön Kongtrul]], and [[Mipam Gyatso]], to name only a few masters from all traditions of Tibetan Buddhism. It should be noted that according to Chinese tradition, the author of this essential Buddha-Nature text was a man named [[Sāramati]], a member of the kṣatriya caste from Central or Northern India. A northern Indian named [[Ratnamati]] is said to have come to China from Madhyadeśa between 498 and 508 and translated the <em>Ratnagotravibhāga</em> in Luoyang between 511 and 520. He may or may not have brought the manuscript with him, and he may have been assisted by [[Bodhiruci]].


The methods of practice relating to buddha-nature naturally reflect the theory that is used to describe it. If buddha-nature is already complete and perfect, then one need not do anything to attain it. Mahāyāna meditation and virtuous deeds become something one does to display one's enlightenment, as in the case of Zen and Japanese Shingon rituals, or one need only rest in the natural purity of mind, as in Tibetan Dzogchen or Mahāmudrā. If buddha-nature is a potential that must be developed and perfected, then one has a lot of work to do and those same practices are described as necessary in order to accumulate merit and purify the obscurations, such as are described in both Tantra and Sūtra-based path structures embraced by the Geluk and other Tibetan traditions.
<div class="border-tb-redfade my-4 py-3 d-flex justify-content-center flex-wrap no-drop-cap-p sun-2-bg" style="margin: 0 -3rem;">
{{RelatedButton
|link=People/Asaṅga
|image=https://commons.tsadra.org/images/thumb/c/c6/Asanga_%28detail%29.jpg/308px-Asanga_%28detail%29.jpg
|text=Asaṅga
|label=Person
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
{{RelatedButton
|link=People/Rngog_blo_ldan_shes_rab
|image=https://commons.tsadra.org/images/d/de/Ngok_Lotsawa.jpg
|text=Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab
|label=Person
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
</div>


Buddha-nature is taught in a wide range of scriptures, both those said to be the word of the Buddha and commentaries by Indian, Chinese, and Tibetan masters. A group of early Indian sūtras introduced the theory around the third or fourth century of the common era. The diverse views presented in this literature were first systematized in a treatise known as the ''Ratnagotravibhāga Mahāyānottaratantraśāstra'', a title that roughly translates as “The Superior Continuum (''uttaratantra'') of the Mahāyāna, A Treatise (''śāstra'') Analyzing (''vibhāga'') the Source (''gotra'') of the Three Jewels (''ratna'').” In Tibet this text is divided into root verses and commentary which are separately attributed to the Bodhisattva Maitreya and the great Indian master Asaṅga, while in East Asia the entire text is believed to have been written by a north Indian named Sāramati. Popularly known in Tibet as the ''Gyulama'' (''Uttaratantra'' in Sanskrit), the treatise has been widely taught and written about by all traditions of Buddhism there. The treatise was less influential in East Asia, where the ''Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra'' was of much greater importance for the spread of buddha-nature theory.
Buddha-nature in East Asian Buddhism is largely based on the ''Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna'', another treatise whose author is not easily identified. The second-century Indian poet [[Aśvaghoṣa]] is considered by Chinese tradition to have been the author, but most scholars think that unlikely. The sixth-century Indian monk [[Paramārtha]] is credited with its translation, and he may well have composed it as well, in China, along with a team of Chinese scribes. The first commentary appeared in 580, written by the monk Tanyan (516–88), and was followed over the centuries by more than 170 others written in China, Japan, and Korea by some of the great religious leaders of East Asian Buddhism. These included [[Jingying Huiyuan]] of the Chinese Southern Dilun school, the Chinese Chan patriarch [[Shenxiu]], the great Korean monk [[Wǒnhyo]], the Chinese Huayan founder [[Fazang]], and the Japanese founder of the Shingon school, [[Kukai]].  
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="slide" data-anchor="Questions">
<div class="fp-bg buddha-disciples-slide-bg"></div>
<div class="container" style="padding: 15vh;">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8 offset-lg-2">
<div class="discover-slide p-5 rounded depth-3" style="font-size: 1.2em;">
<div class="h2 mt-0 pt-0">'''The Questions'''</div>


<div class="bnw-question mb-4">Are buddha-nature teachings controversial?</div>
The Japanese scholar [[D. T. Suzuki]] first translated the ''[[Awakening of Faith]]'' into English in 1900. Some of the most influential early-twentieth-century American converts used it in their promotion of Buddhism, most notably [[Paul Carus]], the author of ''The Gospel of the Buddha'', and [[Dwight Goddard]], the author of ''The Buddhist Bible''. Columbia University professor [[Yoshito S. Hakeda]] published a reliable translation in 1967. The Russian Buddhologist [[Eugène Obermiller]] first translated the ''[[Ratnagotravibhāga]]'' into English in 1931. Japanese scholar [[Takasaki Jikidō]] published a second English translation in 1966.
Not all Buddhists accept the teachings of buddha-nature, and some actually disparage it as "non-Buddhist." This is because of the similarities between buddha-nature and the "self," which the Buddha famously declared does not exist. The Buddha taught that all individuals are subject to "dependent arising," which simply means we exist because of causes and conditions. We are made up of parts in dependence on other things, and so there is no clear defining line between ourselves and the world. We exist, but we exist as pieces of a larger process that is constantly changing, and there is no underlying permanence to any of it; as the Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, the only constant is change. Because buddha-nature is described as our "essence" or "innate nature" some teachers and scholars have argued that it is no different than the self and is therefore in contradiction with basic Buddhism. Some buddha-nature scriptures even use the word "self" (ātman in Sanskrit) to describe buddha-nature, but they mean the term in a very different way, describing a basic fact of reality shared by all beings rather than an individual essence. Proponents of buddha-nature defend the teaching by either classifying buddha-nature as "provisional," meaning a teaching of practical value that is not literally true, or by explaining that buddha-nature is not something belonging to an individual, but is rather a basic characteristic of having a mind. That is, there are no separate "buddha-natures" belonging to each person. It is like the air in our lungs—it is in us as a integral factor of our being alive, but it is not our individual air.  
*Learn more about the controversies here: [[Ideas|Questions and Controversies]]
**[[Ideas#Provisional_or_Definitive|Are buddha-nature and tathagatagarbha teachings to be taken as "definitive teachings" or "provisional"?]]  
**[[Ideas#Emptiness_or_Luminosity|Is buddha-nature merely an emptiness that is a nonimplicative negation? Or does it represent all the qualities of a completely enlightened buddha?]]
**[[Ideas#Potential_or_Already-perfected|Is buddha-nature a potential we have that needs to be cultivated or something already perfect that simply needs to be revealed?]]


<div class="bnw-question mb-4">Is buddha-nature like a soul? Is it the same as the Hindu ātman?</div>
"Soul" is a Greek-inspired teaching of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. There are many ways that these traditions understand the concept, but at its most basic a soul is said to be a permanent individual entity that survives death. Indian religious traditions such as Hinduism or Buddhism do not have this idea. The Hindu ātman is individual, but more like the wave on an ocean than a truly separate entity—the individuality of the ātman is said to be illusory and is the cause of human suffering. The goal of Hindu practice is to abandon that illusion and experience the universal unity of existence, called Brahmā—for the wave to dissolve back into the ocean. Buddhism however does not accept the individual existence of anything, neither the wave nor the ocean. Both are dependent on causes and conditions to exist. Buddha-nature is neither an individual permanently-existing entity nor a universal presence manifesting as individual entities. Instead it is simply a basic characteristic of sentient existence: the innate capacity for wisdom.


<div class="bnw-question mb-4">What does buddha-nature have to do with enlightenment? </div>
<div class="border-top-redfade mt-4 pt-3 d-flex justify-content-center flex-wrap">
Buddha-nature is the fundamental capacity of the mind to understand the world as it is. The mind is said to be like a glass of dirty water all shaken up by desire and ignorance. When the water in the glass is allowed to still the dirt all settles, revealing the basic purity of the water. So too, when the mind is properly trained, the impurities vanish, and we perceive reality as it actually is, untainted by petty desires and impulses. In other words, buddha-nature theory teaches us that we are fundamentally pure, yet obscured with ignorance. Enlightenment will be achieved by freeing the mind of that ignorance and in so doing revealing our buddha-nature.
{{RelatedButton
</div>
|link=Articles/On_the_Ratnagotravibhāga
</div>
|image=https://commons.tsadra.org/images/5/50/Alexander_Gardner.jpg
</div>
|text=On the Ratnagotravibhāga
</div>
|label=Related Article
</div>
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
{{RelatedButton
|link=Articles/On_the_Awakening_of_Faith_in_the_Mahāyāna
|image=https://commons.tsadra.org/images/5/50/Alexander_Gardner.jpg
|text=On the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna
|label=Related Article
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|target=_blank
}}
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">Some section</div>
 
</div>
</div>
<headertabs/>




Line 81: Line 311:




<div class="discover-container tsadra-buddha-back" style="background-attachment: fixed !important; opacity: 1;">
 
<div id="screenThree" class="discover-screen" style="height: 100vh;">
 
<div class="down link-no-border">{{#widget:SmoothScrollToAnchor
<div class="tsdwiki-depth-1 offwhite-bg rounded my-5 text-article p-3 p-md-4 p-lg-5">
|anchor=screenFour
<div class="h1 mt-0 pt-0 border-bottom-rightfade">Dharma Teachings</div>
|text=<i class="fas fa-chevron-down"></i>
 
}}</div>
<div class="row">
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Karmapa_on_the_Nature_of_Mind]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-120
|target=_blank
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Lama_Tsering:_We_Are_Frozen_1_of_2]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-120
|target=_blank
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/The_Mind:_Intrinsically_Empty,_Naturally_Radiant:_Teaching_by_Joseph_Goldstein]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-120
|target=_blank
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Just_Seeing_Is_Buddha-Nature:_Talk_by_Bon_Soeng_at_Empty_Gate_Zen_Center]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-120
|target=_blank
}}
</div>
</div>
<div id="screenFour" class="discover-screen overview-screen" style="opacity: 1;">
<div class="h2">More on Buddha-Nature</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="row m-0">
<div class="col-lg-6">
<div class="col-lg-10 offset-lg-1">
<div class="tsdwiki-home-tile link-no-border tsdwiki-pop-off rounded overflow-hidden m-0">
<div class="screen-heading">Overview</div>
<div class="row m-0" style="height: 100%;">
<div class="screen-text">
<div class="col-4 p-0">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
<div class="filterable text-left p-0 link-no-border depth-2">
|classes=w-100 h-100
<div class="bnw-page-tile pop-hover mt-1 mb-4 position-relative">
|src={{filepath:Pecha.jpg|1000}}
<div class="tile-image-wrapper">{{#widget:DivWithBackImg
|imageposition=50% 50%
|src={{filepath:Sri-lanka-1024347.jpg|500}}
|styles=
|imageposition=center
|imageSource=
|classes=tile-image
}}</div>
}}
<div class="col-8 px-4 pt-2 position-relative" style="padding-bottom: 4rem;">
</div>
<div class="tsdwiki-home-tile-heading border-0">Discover More</div>
<div class="tile-content">
<div class="">Read and watch, listen and learn––dharma talks, interviews, books, and articles.</div>
</div>
<div class="position-absolute text-90 carnelian" style="right: 1.5rem; bottom: 1rem;">Go deeper</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>{{#widget:OverlayLink
|link=Begin_Discovering_Your_Buddha-Nature
|target=_self
|classes=none
|title=Discover More
}}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="down link-no-border dark-text">{{#widget:SmoothScrollToAnchor
<div class="col-lg-6 p-0 pt-3 pt-lg-0 d-flex justify-content-center flex-wrap">
|anchor=screenFive
{{RelatedButton
|text=<i class="fas fa-chevron-down"></i>
|link=Ask_the_writer-in-residence
}}</div>
|imagefile=Library-unsplash.jpg
|text=Ask the writer-in-residence
|label=Questions Answered
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|wrapperclasses=m-2
}}
{{RelatedButton
|link=Texts/Ratnagotravibhāga_Mahāyānottaratantraśāstra
|imagefile=Screen_Shot_2018-06-20_at_3.54.38_PM.png
|text=The Ratnagotravibhāga
|textclasses=text-90
|label=Study
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|wrapperclasses=m-2
}}
{{RelatedButton
|link=Events
|imagefile=Vienna-Symposium-Banner-for-Workshops-Meetings-Tsadra-website.jpg
|text=Events
|label=Watch & Listen
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|wrapperclasses=m-2
}}
{{RelatedButton
|link=Topic_of_the_week
|imagefile=Mic.jpg
|text=Topic of the week
|label=Read, Watch & Listen
|label-right=<i class="ml-1 fad fa-arrow-up rotate45"></i>
|wrapperclasses=m-2
}}
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="screenFive" class="discover-screen listen-back" style="opacity: 1;">
</div>
<div class="container">
 
<div class="row m-0">
<div class="col-lg-1"></div>
<div class="col-lg-10">
<div class="screen-heading">Watch & Listen</div>
<div class="screen-text">
<div class="row mt-3 no-shadow">
<div class="col-lg-6 mt-1">
{{CustomTile
|wrapperClasses=col-12 text-left p-0
|link=none
|image=File:Buddha_disciples_gold.jpg
|watermark=Click me
|content=<div class="tile-heading">'''The Questions'''</div>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.


<div class="bnw-question mb-4">Are buddha-nature teachings controversial?</div>
Not all Buddhists accept the teachings of buddha-nature, and some actually disparage it as "non-Buddhist." This is because of the similarities between buddha-nature and the "self," which the Buddha famously declared does not exist. The Buddha taught that all individuals are subject to "dependent arising," which simply means we exist thanks to causes and conditions. We are made up of parts in dependence on other things, and so there is no clear defining line between ourselves and the world. We exist, but we exist as parts of a larger process that is constantly changing, and there is no underlying permanence to any of it. As the Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, the only constant is change. Because buddha-nature is described as our "essence" or "innate nature" some teachers and scholars have argued that it is a return to a notion of a self and is therefore in contradiction with basic Buddhism. Some buddha-nature scriptures even use the word "self" (ātman in Sanskrit) to describe buddha-nature, but they mean the term in a very different way, describing a basic fact of reality shared by all beings rather than an individual essence. Proponents of buddha-nature defend the teaching by either classifying buddha-nature as "provisional," meaning a teaching of practical value that is not literally true, or by explaining that buddha-nature is not something belonging to an individual, but is rather a basic characteristic of having a mind. It is like the air in our lungs—it is in us as a necessary factor of our being alive, but it is not our individual air.


<div class="bnw-question mb-4">Is buddha-nature like a soul? Is it the same as the Hindu ātman?</div>
"Soul" is a Greek-inspired teaching of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. There are many ways that these traditions understand the soul, but at its most basic it is said to be a permanent individual entity that survives our death. Indian religious traditions do not have this idea. The Hindu ātman is individual, but more like the wave on an ocean than a truly separate entity—the individuality of the ātman is said to be illusory and the cause of human suffering. The goal of Hindu practice is to abandon that illusion and experience the universal unity of existence, for the wave to dissolve back into the ocean. Buddhism however does not accept the individual existence of anything, neither the wave or the ocean. Both are dependent on causes and conditions to exist. Buddha-nature is neither an individual permanently-existing entity nor a universal presence manifesting as individual entities. Instead it is simply a basic characteristic of sentient existence, the innate capacity for wisdom.


<div class="bnw-question mb-4">What does buddha-nature have to do with enlightenment?</div>
<!--
Buddha-nature is the fundamental capacity of the mind to understand the world as it is. The mind is said to be like a glass of dirty water all shaken up by desire and ignorance. When the water in the glass is allowed to still the dirt all settles, revealing the basic purity of the water. So to, when the mind is properly trained the impurities vanish, and we perceive reality as it actually is, untainted by petty desires and impulses. In other words, buddha-nature teaches us that we are fundamentally pure, yet obscured with ignorance. Enlightenment will be achieved by freeing the mind of that ignorance.
 
|expandable=true
<div class="section" data-anchor="OnFromThere">{{DiscoverSectionArrowToFooter}}
}}
<div class="fp-bg site-bg"></div>
</div>
<div class="container" style="padding: 15vh 0; max-width: 1200px;">
{{PageTileQuery
<div class="row">
|query=[[Media/Your_True_Nature:_Talk_on_Refuge_and_Buddha-Nature_by_Yongey_Mingyur_Rinpoche]]
<div class="col-lg-10 offset-lg-1 px-xs-4 px-sm-4 px-md-4">
|classes=col-lg-6 text-left
<div class="h2 mt-0 pt-0 position-relative">{{DiscoverSectionUpArrow}}</div>
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Articles/Klaus-Dieter_Mathes_Interview_on_Buddha-Nature]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-left
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Buddha_Nature_by_Ringu_Tulku_Rinpoche_(Part_1_of_3)]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-left
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Media/Buddhism:_One_Teacher,_Many_Traditions:_Chapter_14:_Buddha_Nature:_A_Talk_by_Thubten_Chodron_(Part_1_of_4)]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-left
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Articles/Impermanence_is_Buddha_Nature]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-left
}}
{{PageTileQuery
|query=[[Articles/Lying_to_Tell_the_Truth-Upaya_in_Mahayana_Buddhism_and_Oikonomia_in_Alexandrian_Christianity]]
|classes=col-lg-6 text-left
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/Questions
|label=The Questions
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/thumb/c/c0/Buddha_disciples_gold.jpg/320px-Buddha_disciples_gold.jpg
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/Doctrine
|label=The Doctrine
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/thumb/d/db/Wheel-of-life.jpg/609px-Wheel-of-life.jpg
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/People
|label=The People
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/a/a3/Asanga_and_Maitreya.jpg
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/Traditions
|label=The Traditions
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/thumb/5/5f/Tibetan-debate-sera.jpg/800px-Tibetan-debate-sera.jpg
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/Articles/Evidence_of_our_buddha-nature
|label=Evidence of our buddha-nature
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/1/1d/Gyatrul_Rinpoche2.png
|backposition=50% 35%
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/History
|label=The History of Buddha-nature (Level 1)
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/thumb/a/a3/Ascetic_Sumedha_and_Dipankara_Buddha.jpg/320px-Ascetic_Sumedha_and_Dipankara_Buddha.jpg
|backposition=top
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/Media/Dealing_with_Depression:_Interview_with_Jetsunma_Tenzin_Palmo_on_Study_Buddhism
|label=Dealing with Depression
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/5/58/Jestunma_Tenzin_Palmo.jpg
|backposition=50% 25%
}}
{{MiniTileButton
|height=55px
|link=/index.php/Media/Buddha_Nature_and_Permission:_Anne_Klein_at_Dawn_Mountain
|label=Buddha Nature and Permission
|angle=right
|imgurl=http://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/4/46/Klein%2C_Anne-Official.jpg
|backposition=50% 25%
}}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="down link-no-border">{{#widget:SmoothScrollToAnchor
 
|anchor=screenOne
|text=<i class="fas fa-chevron-up"></i>
<div id="fp-footer"></div>
}}</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div> -->

Latest revision as of 11:00, 20 August 2024



Discover




Our Buddha-Nature

Buddha-nature is the capacity for enlightenment and freedom present in every being, a fundamental core of goodness, wisdom, and compassion that is hidden by clouds of ignorance—so hidden in fact that we might never even suspect its presence. It is like the sun that continues to shine regardless of the clouds that may cover it. By clearing away those clouds of greed, anger, and selfishness we uncover a state of perfection that is, and always has been, our own true nature.

Although it may be difficult to completely overcome all our limitations and clear away those clouds, the fact that our nature is fundamentally the same as a buddha's is what makes the whole path to enlightenment possible. We already have everything we need to begin walking a path that leads to true happiness. We simply need to have confidence in the presence of our buddha-nature and the courage to begin the journey to uncover it.




What Then?

Everyone has buddha-nature. The only difference between us and an enlightened being such as a buddha is that a buddha recognizes this nature and the rest of us do not. The goal of Buddhist practice is to allow our true nature to shine forth. We may not be perfect buddhas yet, but we have the capacity to develop wisdom and compassion and free ourselves from selfishness, greed, and hatred. Buddhist teachings and practices aim at revealing our true nature by cultivating the proper outlook and behavior, and by ceasing the negative habits that cause dissatisfaction and suffering. This website is focused on the teachings associated with traditions of training that lead to real liberation, and we hope that you can learn a great deal from reading and watching the content here. You can start by reading and watching the following introductory materials.




[edit]

What is Buddha-Nature?

All Buddhist traditions claim that the nature of our mind is luminous—that is to say, the natural state of our mind is free, open, and pure awareness. Buddha-nature refers to this pure, natural, and luminous state of our consciousness which is free from any duality or defilement. All beings are said to possess buddha-nature, which is what makes enlightenment possible. The myriad Buddhist practices, from quiet sitting meditation to visualization of deities, chanting, and yogic endeavors, are diverse methods to shake off the temporary cloud-like obscurations veiling the sun of one's own nature.


Everything Is Buddhanature

Related Article

Evidence of our buddha-nature

Related Article

Beyond the sun always shining behind the clouds, two other metaphors are traditionally used to describe buddha-nature: a golden statue encased in muck and the seed of a mango tree. The first suggests that our buddha-nature is already perfect and only needs to be revealed in order to manifest our enlightenment. The second presents buddha-nature as a potential that must be cultivated in order to attain enlightenment. A third, less common interpretation is that we acquire buddha-nature at a certain stage of spiritual accomplishment, like a fruiting tree. These three models—disclosure, transformation, and obtainment—are used by different traditions to define buddha-nature and describe the methods to fully actualize enlightenment.

Not all Buddhist traditions are comfortable with language that describes buddha-nature as the mind's fundamental state, suspecting that such descriptions promote the idea that buddha-nature is some kind of abiding individual self. The Buddha, of course, famously taught that such an idea of a self is wrong, a delusion we create but which causes us suffering. However, buddha-nature is not taught as an individual self but more like the natural characteristic of mind, akin to wet being the natural characteristic of water. Some Buddhist philosophers have rejected such a description of buddha-nature. They maintain that ultimate reality cannot be described by language because language is limited by dualism (self and other, good and bad, and so forth), whereas the ultimate is nondual. Such philosophers will only say what the ultimate is not—not permanent, not individualistic, not ignorant, and so forth. The limitations of such a position for teaching about experience are obvious; how can one describe anything without language? Still others have argued that buddha-nature is misguided because it undermines the drive to improve ourselves, as though we must think of ourselves as bereft of good qualities in order to become better people. On these pages and the other materials linked here, you will find details about fascinating debates from these different perspectives.

In Indian and Tibetan traditions, philosophers have also debated whether buddha-nature is a teaching that one should take literally or if it was meant to promote and encourage the student to move in the right direction. Some scriptures support the interpretation that buddha-nature is a provisional teaching given to those discouraged by the daunting project of attaining enlightenment. Other sources, however, present buddha-nature as a definitive teaching and take the position that the mind's natural luminosity is self-evident and need not be explained as a rhetorical trick. They maintain that if the mind were not already enlightened by nature, then enlightenment would have to be produced. This would contradict the definition of ultimate reality—that is, nirvāṇa—as unproduced and unconditioned.

Video
Karmapa on The Nature of All Beings
A commentary across lifetimes. H.H. the 17th Karmapa, Ogyen Trinley Dorje, comments on a quote of the 3rd Karmapa, Rangjung Dorje: "The nature of all beings is always Buddha" (འགྲོ་བའི་རང་བཞིན་རྟག་ཏུ་སངས་རྒྱས་).
Karmapa, 17th. "All Beings Are Buddha by Nature." Interview with H.H. Karmapa conducted at Vajra Vidja Institute, Sarnath, Varanasi, India, February 2015. Video, 1:41. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pll8nGuWtU&list=PL8sDrkwWlohTjleLphxWRmLge5hgbpAXM.
Video
Dealing with Depression: Interview with Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo on Study Buddhism
Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo discusses buddha-nature beautifully for a general audience.
Palmo, Tenzin. "Dealing with Depression." Interview by Matt Linden and Yura Milyutin. Produced by Study Buddhism (Website), September 2016. Video, 3:30. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0ChZpIBgSo.
Video
Discovering Buddha Nature: Talk by Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche
In this short teaching, Mingyur Rinpoche describes buddha-nature with the metaphor of a diamond covered in mud, explaining how the innate purity of awareness can be obscured, but never changed.
Mingyur, Yongey, 7th. "Discovering Buddha Nature." Produced by Tergar Learning Community, April 7, 2014. Video, 1:48. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srRcHz9jVrg.
Article
Buddhanature: You're Perfect as You Are
Why feel bad about yourself when you are naturally aware, loving, and wise? Mingyur Rinpoche explains how to see past the temporary stuff and discover your own buddhanature.
Mingyur Rinpoche. "Buddhanature: You're Perfect as You Are." Lion's Roar, November 8, 2019.
[edit]

The Questions

One of the most common questions about buddha-nature is whether it is the same as or similar to the Christian or Hindu notions of a soul. It is not. Buddha-nature is not an individual entity—there are not separate buddha-natures in each being. Christianity teaches that each person's soul exists independently and will survive that person's death. There is plenty of debate across traditions, but in general the soul is said to be fundamentally polluted by Original Sin and that it requires God's intervention to be saved. The Hindu notion of ātman is similarly understood to be real, but only in the sense of partaking in a universal divine presence called Brahman; the individuality of the ātman is believed to be illusory.

Buddha-nature, in contrast to both of these ideas, is neither individualistic nor a manifestation of a divine presence. Rather, it is the basic faculty of awareness—a natural luminosity that is unchanged no matter how ignorant or benighted we are. It is like water that has been muddied—the water is fundamentally clear, and it will return to that state when left to settle—or like a cloudy sky, where the clarity of the sky remains constant even as clouds pass through it. Because buddha-nature is empty of any conditioning, it is fundamentally pure, no different from the enlightened state of a buddha. For that reason, we all have the potential to cast off ignorance and suffering and achieve buddhahood, and we are solely responsible ourselves for doing so. Questions regarding what buddha-nature actually is, as well as several other questions, have been debated by Buddhist scholars from different traditions through the centuries. To learn more, navigate to the Questions page and the Topics page in the Explore section.


The Questions

Explore more
[edit]

The History

The seeds of buddha-nature teachings were planted in some of the earliest Buddhist scriptures. Passages such as this one, from the Aṅguttaranikāya — "Luminous, monks, is this mind, but sometimes it is defiled by adventitious defilements"— suggest a natural state that is only temporarily obscured by the stains of saṃsāra. Buddhism before the rise of the Mahāyāna, however, focused as it was on the long and arduous transformation from delusion and suffering into enlightenment.

This changed in the early centuries of the Common Era, when scriptures teaching buddha-nature began to circulate and gain attention. These were the so-called buddha-nature scriptures, such as the Tathāgatagarbhasūtra, the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, and the Śrīmālādevīsūtra. Drawing on the Mahāyāna doctrine of the Buddha as a universal principle of enlightened mind, they taught that enlightenment is an essential factor of human existence. Rather than be transformed into a buddha, these scriptures taught, one need only reveal one's true nature to become free.

The buddha-nature teachings spread to China starting in the fifth century; there they inspired the composition of the Awakening of Faith and Chinese doctrines such as original enlightenment and sudden enlightenment, becoming part of the standard doctrine of all East Asian Buddhist traditions. Tibetans knew of buddha-nature theory as early as the seventh century, but the teachings spread widely only in the eleventh century, following the translation of the Ratnagotravibhāga, a fifth-century Indian treatise. Since then,buddha-nature has been a principal topic of philosophical interpretation, doctrinal debates and spiritual practice in Tibet.

[edit]

The Texts

Buddhism has a vast trove of scriptures, known as sūtras and tantras, that are said to be the authentic word of the Buddha. Buddhists revere these books, although they are considered subject to interpretation, and there are an enormous number of commentaries elucidating and expanding on the teachings. The seeds of buddha-nature doctrine are sprinkled throughout this literature. A core group of scriptures that initially taught buddha-nature known as the tathāgatagarbha sūtras date between the second and fourth centuries CE. These include the Tathāgatagarbhasūtra, the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, the Śrīmālādevīsūtra, and several others. The famous Laṅkāvatārasūtra was also important for buddha-nature theory. In East Asia the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna (大乗起信論) and the Vajrasamādhisūtra are the most influential treatises in spreading buddha-nature theory.

In Tibetan Buddhism, there exists a great number of writings on buddha-nature, which are either translated from Indic sources or original Tibetan compositions. However, there is a single core text studied in all Tibetan Buddhist lineages and in the current academic study of buddha-nature called The Treatise on the Ultimate Continuum (Gyü Lama in Tibetan, Uttaratantra in Sanskrit). Also known as the Ratnagotravibhāga, this text was originally composed in Sanskrit and translated into Tibetan sometime in the eleventh century, and many commentaries on it have been written right up to the present day. It is used as a fundamental source for buddha-nature teachings on this website.

In this short video Karl Brunnhölzl, translator of the Gyü Lama into English, discusses the questions about the origins and authorship of the text.

On the source texts

Read more
[edit]

The Traditions

The doctrine of buddha-nature—the innate enlightened nature of mind—is found in all Mahāyāna Buddhist traditions, but explaining what that really means differs considerably across traditions.[1] All Mahāyāna traditions also teach that because all phenomena arise in dependence on other phenomena they are empty of any special nature. How to describe that emptiness and what it means for the Buddhist practitioner, however, is a matter of considerable disagreement and often defines key differences between traditions. Whereas Indian Yogācāra masters use positive language to describe the mind and the true nature of reality, in the ancient Indian Madhyamaka school of Nāgārjuna and his disciples, negative language is used to describe reality. "Because there are no phenomena that are not dependently arisen," Nāgārjuna wrote, "there are no phenomena that are not empty."[2] Thus while buddha-nature is generally accepted in Yogācāra, in Madhyamaka it is considered either provisionally (that is, not literally) true or as a synonym for emptiness.

Buddha-nature is a central doctrine in most East Asian Buddhist traditions with the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna, a Chinese composition that introduced the concepts of original enlightenment and actualized enlightenment, as one of the most influential Buddhist scriptures. Original enlightenment refers to the fundamental nature of mind obscured by temporary stains, while the actualised state is that same innately enlightened mind freed of those obscurations. The Tiantai (Tendai in Japan), Huayan (Kegon in Japan), and Chan (Zen in Japan) and their offshoots all accepted buddha-nature, as did the tantric Shingon school in Japan, although they differ in terms of approaches and significance they attribute to these teachings. Dōgen, one of the founders of Japanese Zen, taught that meditation is practiced not to attain enlightenment but to express one's innate enlightenment. This is expressed in the famous Zen proverb "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." That is, if you think that the Buddha is someone or somewhere else, you're wasting your time; destroy that idea and realize your own innate enlightenment. In Pure Land there remains some disagreement, with some sects arguing that ordinary beings do not have buddha-nature but only acquire it upon being saved by the Buddha Amitābha and being born in the Pure Land.

Among dominant Tibetan and Himalayan traditions of Nyingma, Sakya, Kagyu, and Geluk, which are better understood as transmission lineages, there is a wide range of understanding and practical application of buddha-nature. Buddha-nature in Tibet is a common topic of debate and discourse, two points being whether buddha-nature teachings are provisional or definitive and whether buddha-nature is simply another word for emptiness or an innate nature with its own qualities. These conversations began in India but took on new life in Tibet through the analytic and meditative traditions of Ratnagotravibhāga exegesis. The analytic tradition largely relies on strict Madhyamaka presentations of emptiness and rejects any attempt to describe ultimate reality with positive characteristics. The meditative tradition encompasses a wide body of buddha-nature theory found primarily in the Jonang, Kagyu, and Nyingma traditions, usually, although not always, in some form of a unity of emptiness and luminosity. Great detail can be found on these positions and their counterparts throughout this website.

In the emerging Buddhist traditions of America and Europe, most Buddhist follow the tradition they received from Asia while some of them opt for a more eclectic approach to teachings and practices. Almost all of them embrace buddha-nature as a core tenet, explicitly or otherwise. Among those adopting the eclectic approach, Jack Kornfield, for example, has a teaching series called "Your Buddha Nature" and leads retreats on the topic. Sharon Salzberg uses the practice of loving kindness and mindfulness, through her Metta Hour series, to realise buddha-nature, the highest potential. Perhaps more than any other contemporary Western Buddhist, Joseph Goldstein models the modern Western synthesis of disparate Asian Buddhist traditions. His book One Dharma unites Tibetan Dzogchen and Zen with the Theravada Vipassanā tradition of the Burmese, Thai, and Bengali teachers that formed the major part of his training. Goldstein puts forward buddha-nature (or its synonyms) as the definition of wisdom in his One Dharma synthesis. He writes, "In Buddhism there are many names for ultimate freedom: Buddha-Nature, the Unconditioned, Dharmakaya, the Unborn, the Pure Heart, Mind Essence, Nature of Mind, Ultimate Bodhicitta, Nirvana."[3]

  1. The doctrine of buddha-nature in its full form was not present in early Buddhism and is not accepted by most contemporary Asian Theravada Buddhist traditions. In mainstream Theravada, consciousness is one of the five aggregates, the conditioned aspects of existence which are left behind upon the attainment of nirvāṇa. The notion of a mind that exists apart from the aggregates, which is primordially pure and somehow innately enlightened, would be heretical to most Theravada Buddhists. As the contemporary Western Theravadin teacher Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu has written, "The Buddha never advocated attributing an innate nature of any kind to the mind—good, bad, or Buddha." Not only are the buddha-nature teachings not true, he continues, but they hinder one's progress on the path: "If you assume that the mind is basically good, you'll feel capable but will easily get complacent." See "Freedom from Buddha Nature," para. 18–19, dhammatalks.org. This is not a universal view; the Thai Forest tradition that began at the turn of the twentieth century espouses the view that the mind is "luminous" in the sense of being innately pure, nondual awareness, and that it continues to exist in nirvāṇa.
  2. Mūlamadhyamakakārikā XXIV, 19
  3. Joseph Goldstein, One Dharma: The Emerging Western Buddhism (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2002), 4. See this book on the publisher's site.
[edit]

The People

Writings on buddha-nature can be divided into two main categories: those that are said to be the word of the Buddha and those that were composed by the great masters to explain the doctrine. The sūtras discussing buddha-nature are generally attributed to the Buddha although modern scholars date the sūtras in their current form from the beginning of the common era. These works are collectively known as the tathāgatagarbha sūtras and they contain conversations between the Buddha and followers such as Śrīmālādevī and Dhāraṇïśvararāja. They lay out the foundation for buddha-nature philosophy and practice.

In course of time, Indian scholars began to produce treatises that systematized the received teachings. The earliest well known historical figure to write about buddha-nature is perhaps Nāgārjuna, who wrote his Dharmadhātustava and other hymnic writings which takes buddha-nature as the main topic. However, the most influential Indian commentarial writing on buddha-nature is the Ratnagotravibhāga, which became the main scriptural source for buddha-nature theory in Tibet. The Indian and Central Asian traditions, hold that the Ratnagotravibhāga was written by Maitreya. In the Tibetan tradition, it is believed that the bodhisattva Maitreya revealed the root verses of the treatise to the fourth-century founder of Yogācāra, Ārya Asaṅga, who then composed the prose commentary. It is not clear how the text was transmitted in centuries after Asaṅga but the Tibetan tradition has it that Maitrīpa rediscovered the text from a stūpa in the 11th century. Subsequent to this, the teaching of the text was passed down to the Kashmiri Pandita Sajjana taught the text to many people, but two stand out in the annals of history for their influence on the development of Buddhism in Tibet: Ngok Lotsāwa and Tsen Khawoche. These two studied around the same time with Sajjana, but returned to Tibet with two very different approaches to the text, which lead to two very different styles of study and practice which still exist today. The text itself was translated into Tibetan by six different teams, including one led by Atiśa Dīpaṃkara and another by Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab, who worked directly with Sajjana. Many of the greatest Tibetan philosophers have written commentaries and synopses, including Ngok Lotsāwa, Pakpa Lodrö Gyaltsen, the Third Karmapa, Dölpopa, Gyalse Tokme Zangpo, Gyaltsap Je, Bodong Paṇchen, Gö Lotsāwa, Śākya Chokden, Tāranātha, Jamgön Kongtrul, and Mipam Gyatso, to name only a few masters from all traditions of Tibetan Buddhism. It should be noted that according to Chinese tradition, the author of this essential Buddha-Nature text was a man named Sāramati, a member of the kṣatriya caste from Central or Northern India. A northern Indian named Ratnamati is said to have come to China from Madhyadeśa between 498 and 508 and translated the Ratnagotravibhāga in Luoyang between 511 and 520. He may or may not have brought the manuscript with him, and he may have been assisted by Bodhiruci.

Asaṅga

Person

Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab

Person

Buddha-nature in East Asian Buddhism is largely based on the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna, another treatise whose author is not easily identified. The second-century Indian poet Aśvaghoṣa is considered by Chinese tradition to have been the author, but most scholars think that unlikely. The sixth-century Indian monk Paramārtha is credited with its translation, and he may well have composed it as well, in China, along with a team of Chinese scribes. The first commentary appeared in 580, written by the monk Tanyan (516–88), and was followed over the centuries by more than 170 others written in China, Japan, and Korea by some of the great religious leaders of East Asian Buddhism. These included Jingying Huiyuan of the Chinese Southern Dilun school, the Chinese Chan patriarch Shenxiu, the great Korean monk Wǒnhyo, the Chinese Huayan founder Fazang, and the Japanese founder of the Shingon school, Kukai.

The Japanese scholar D. T. Suzuki first translated the Awakening of Faith into English in 1900. Some of the most influential early-twentieth-century American converts used it in their promotion of Buddhism, most notably Paul Carus, the author of The Gospel of the Buddha, and Dwight Goddard, the author of The Buddhist Bible. Columbia University professor Yoshito S. Hakeda published a reliable translation in 1967. The Russian Buddhologist Eugène Obermiller first translated the Ratnagotravibhāga into English in 1931. Japanese scholar Takasaki Jikidō published a second English translation in 1966.


On the Ratnagotravibhāga

Related Article

On the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna

Related Article





Dharma Teachings
Video
Karmapa on the Nature of Mind
[START at 6 min 45 secs]. On the morning of January 3, 2013, the Gyalwang Karmapa gave an impromptu teaching on the nature of mind to a large group of international students gathered at the Root Institute for Wisdom Culture, Bodhgaya. Teaching in a mixture of Tibetan and English, he began the session by inviting questions from the students gathered. The first question was soon put forward: How do we experience Buddha-nature on a practical level? "I thought that if you asked me questions it would make it easier for me," he joked in English in response to the depth of the question, adding, "But this question makes it more complicated for me!"

As the laughter died down, the Gyalwang Karmapa delivered a profound and reasoned teaching on Buddha-nature and the nature of mind. "All sentient beings are endowed with the potential for complete Buddhahood," he began.

They are inherently Buddhas, and inherently that Buddha-nature is completely free of any stains -- it is stainless, and perfect. Yet, at the level of relative or immediate experience, our experience is not this way. Our experience is that this perfectly pure Buddha-nature is veiled by our confused outlook.

Shifting the teaching to a deeper level, the Gyalwang Karmapa then described the dharmakaya, or the Buddha's enlightened mind. "Lord Gampopa said that the nature of thoughts is dharmakaya," he explained.

Thoughts and dharmakaya are inseparable. We have this dualistic approach of seeing dharmakaya as pure and thoughts as impure, but we need to understand the inseparability of thoughts and dharmakaya.

The Gyalwang Karmapa spoke directly in English as he continued:

Every moment that we have thought, every moment that thought arises, we have the opportunity to recognize the nature of thought as emptiness or dharmakaya, whatever you want to call it. Thought and the emptiness of its nature are inseparable. We can't make them separate; there's no separation. Because thought itself is emptiness that means actually in everyday life we have lots of opportunity to recognize and realize the nature of thought, or nature of emptiness, or dharmakaya. But we just follow the appearances, the illusions -- we don't look deeper.

The Gyalwang Karmapa then responded to several more questions from the audience, teaching briefly on the progressive views of emptiness within Tibetan Buddhism which culminate in the final Madhyamaka view. The final questioner echoed the thoughts of many gathered when she asked the Gyalwang Karmapa how his students could help and support him. "I feel energized and inspired by all the love and the support that I receive from all of you. That really is sufficient. I don't need anything more than your love and support," he replied, to resounding applause.

Continuing an annual tradition, the teaching took place at the request of the Root Institute for Wisdom Culture. The Gyalwang Karmapa taught to an overflowing gompa, with hundreds of students spilling out into the surrounding balconies and gardens. In addition to mostly international students, the audience also included local Indian children from the Root Institute's school.
Karmapa, 17th. "The Nature of Mind: A Teaching at the Root Institute." Filmed January 3, 2013 in Bodhgaya, India. Produced by Tsurphu Labrang Media. Video, 1:04:37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_uccsZNg5g.
Video
We Are Frozen
Everest, Tsering. "We Are Frozen." Pt. 1 of 2. Filmed April 28, 2019 at Chagdud Gonpa Odsal Ling, Brazil. Video, 8:39. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcsNP5fumks.
Everest, Tsering. "We Are Frozen." Pt. 1 of 2. Filmed April 28, 2019 at Chagdud Gonpa Odsal Ling, Brazil. Video, 8:39. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcsNP5fumks.
Audio
The Mind: Intrinsically Empty, Naturally Radiant: Teaching by Joseph Goldstein
Goldstein, Joseph. “The Mind: Intrinsically Empty, Naturally Radiant.” Recorded March 25, 2006 at Insight Meditation Society - Forest Refuge, Barre, MA. Audio, 13:06. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PctzOkbGu0A
Goldstein, Joseph. “The Mind: Intrinsically Empty, Naturally Radiant.” Recorded March 25, 2006 at Insight Meditation Society - Forest Refuge, Barre, MA. Audio, 13:06. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PctzOkbGu0A
Video
Just Seeing Is Buddha-Nature: Talk by Bon Soeng at Empty Gate Zen Center
Zen Master Bon Soeng teaches on a verse from the Compass of Zen by Zen Master Seung Sahn (Shambhala Dragon Editions, 1997).
Soeng, Bon. "Just Seeing Is Buddha-Nature." Filmed March 13, 2013 in Berkeley, CA. Video, 33:05, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN9vZjMh65A.
More on Buddha-Nature
Discover More
Read and watch, listen and learn––dharma talks, interviews, books, and articles.
Go deeper

Ask the writer-in-residence

Questions Answered

The Ratnagotravibhāga

Study

Events

Watch & Listen

Topic of the week

Read, Watch & Listen



Retrieved from "https://buddhanature-new.tsadra.org/index.php?title=Discover&oldid=63604"
Buddha-Nature
A Tsadra Foundation Initiative
A multimedia resource hub for scripture, scholarship,
and teachings on tathāgatagarbha.
Sign up for the Buddha-Nature mailing list:

Tsadra Foundation
Translation & Transmission Conference
DharmaCloud Tibetan eBooks
Buddha-Nature
Śāntideva's Life and Works
Rinchen Terdzö Chenmo
Damngak Rinpoche Dzö
Khyentse Lineage
Dharma Dictionary

བོད་སྐད་
About
Site Guide
Read
Watch
Glossary
Login

Project Description

The purpose of the buddha-nature website is to provide a resource hub for trustworthy information for learning about and teaching the concept of buddha-nature, its associated texts, teachings, lineages, and relevant Buddhist ideas. Unique content will be shared here, but the site will primarily act as a broker for other projects and authors that have already created quality materials, which we will curate for a wide range of audiences.

About us ...
© Tsadra Foundation. Please feel free to use this website and its content in accordance with fair use policies for teaching, scholarship, education, and research.