History of Buddhism (Chos-hbyung), Part 1
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
***{{i|I Aa. The Merit of Study. (3 b. 2.)|9}} | ***{{i|I Aa. The Merit of Study. (3 b. 2.)|9}} | ||
***{{i|I Ab. The Merit of Preaching. (5 a. 1.)|11}} | ***{{i|I Ab. The Merit of Preaching. (5 a. 1.)|11}} | ||
****I Aba<sub>1</sub>. Worship of Buddha by Preaching the Doctrine. (5 a. 2.) —I<br>Abb, Preaching of the Doctrine as superior to Material Gifts. (5 a. 3.) — I Abc<sub>1</sub> Good Memory — a result of expoundIng Scripture. (5 a. 5.) — I Abd<sub>1</sub> Augmentation of Virtue and Attainment of Enlightenment by Preaching. (5 b. 1.)<br> | ****I Aba<sub>1</sub>. Worship of Buddha by Preaching the Doctrine. (5 a. 2.) —I<br>Abb, Preaching of the Doctrine as superior to Material Gifts.<br>(5 a. 3.) — I Abc<sub>1</sub> Good Memory — a result of expoundIng Scripture.<br>(5 a. 5.) — I Abd<sub>1</sub> Augmentation of Virtue and Attainment of<br>Enlightenment by Preaching. (5 b. 1.)<br> | ||
***{{i|I Ac. The Merit of Study and Preaching taken together. (5 b. 5.)|13}} | ***{{i|I Ac. The Merit of Study and Preaching taken together. (5 b. 5.)|13}} | ||
****1 Aca 1 Progress of Spiritual Merit through the Study of the 3 Vehicles. (5 b. 6.) - 1 Acb 1 Honours of Scholarship. (6 a 2.) - I Ace l Attainment of Enlightenment by the Study of the Doctrine. (6 b. 1.)<br> | ****1 Aca 1 Progress of Spiritual Merit through the Study of the 3 Vehicles.<br>(5 b. 6.) - 1 Acb 1 Honours of Scholarship. (6 a 2.) - I Ace l Attainment<br>of Enlightenment by the Study of the Doctrine. (6 b. 1.)<br> | ||
**{{i|I B. The Special Merit of Studying and Preaching the Mahāyānistic Doctrines.<br>(6 b. 6.)|15}} | **{{i|I B. The Special Merit of Studying and Preaching the Mahāyānistic Doctrines.<br>(6 b. 6.)|15}} | ||
***{{i|I Ba. Prevalence over the Merit of the Hīnayānist Saints. (7 a. 1.)|16}} | ***{{i|I Ba. Prevalence over the Merit of the Hīnayānist Saints. (7 a. 1.)|16}} | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
***{{i|III Bb. The Means of Teaching. (30 a. 2.)|70}} | ***{{i|III Bb. The Means of Teaching. (30 a. 2.)|70}} | ||
***{{i|III Bc. The Character of Teaching. (31 a.5.)|73}} | ***{{i|III Bc. The Character of Teaching. (31 a.5.)|73}} | ||
****{{i|III Bca<sub>1</sub> The Character of Teaching with regard to the students. (31. a. 5)|73}} | ****{{i|III Bca<sub>1</sub> The Character of Teaching with regard to the students.<br>(31. a. 5)|73}} | ||
****{{i|III Bcb<sub>1</sub> The same, with regard to the Aim. (31 b. 4)|73}} | ****{{i|III Bcb<sub>1</sub> The same, with regard to the Aim. (31 b. 4)|73}} | ||
****{{i|III Bcc<sub>1</sub> The manner of conducting the Teaching. (31 b. 4.)|74}} | ****{{i|III Bcc<sub>1</sub> The manner of conducting the Teaching. (31 b. 4.)|74}} | ||
*****III Bcc<sub>1</sub>a<sub>2</sub>. Preparations. (31 b. 4.) — III Bcc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub> The Teaching Itself. (32 b. 5.) — III Bcc<sub1</sub>c<sub>2</sub> The Conclusion of Study. (33 a. 2.)<br> | *****III Bcc<sub>1</sub>a<sub>2</sub>. Preparations. (31 b. 4.) — III Bcc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub> The Teaching Itself.<br>(32 b. 5.) — III Bcc<sub1</sub>c<sub>2</sub> The Conclusion of Study. (33 a. 2.)<br> | ||
**{{i|III C. Character of the Methods of Study. (33 a. 3.)|76}} | **{{i|III C. Character of the Methods of Study. (33 a. 3.)|76}} | ||
***{{i|III Ca. Character of the Student. (33 a. 3.)|77}} | ***{{i|III Ca. Character of the Student. (33 a. 3.)|77}} | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
*****IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>a<sub>4</sub> The Essential Character of the 3 Bodies. (57 a. 2.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>b<sub>4</sub> The Etymology of "''dharmakāya''" , "''saṁbhogakāya''", and "''nirmāṇakāya''". (57 a. 3.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>c<sub>4</sub> The 3 Bodies as corresponding to their Aim. (57 b. 3.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>d<sub>4</sub> The 3 Bodies as the Objects of Cognition of the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas. (57 b. 4.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>e<sub>4</sub> The various Aspects of the 3 Bodies. (58 a. 4.).<br> | *****IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>a<sub>4</sub> The Essential Character of the 3 Bodies. (57 a. 2.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>b<sub>4</sub> The Etymology of "''dharmakāya''" , "''saṁbhogakāya''", and "''nirmāṇakāya''". (57 a. 3.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>c<sub>4</sub> The 3 Bodies as corresponding to their Aim. (57 b. 3.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>d<sub>4</sub> The 3 Bodies as the Objects of Cognition of the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas. (57 b. 4.) — IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>a<sub>3</sub>e<sub>4</sub> The various Aspects of the 3 Bodies. (58 a. 4.).<br> | ||
****IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>b<sub>3</sub> The Acts of the Buddha. (59 a. 3.) | ****IV Acc<sub>1</sub>b<sub>2</sub>b<sub>3</sub> The Acts of the Buddha. (59 a. 3.) | ||
|StopPersonRedirects=No | |||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 16:02, 19 June 2023
To European readers Tibetan historiography is known from Tārānātha’s History of Buddhism in India, translated simultaneously by two members of the St. Petersburg Academy of Science, W. P. Wassilieff into Russian and A. Schiefner into German.[1] But this is not the only work of this kind which the Tibetan literature contains. There are many others. Among them „ The History of Buddhism in India and Tibet”[2]) by the great scholar Bu-ston Rin-chen-grub-pa (pronouce Budon Rinchenḍub), also called Budon Rinpoche, is held in great esteem by Tibetan and Mongolian learned lamas. It is distinguished from the work of Tārānātha by the plan of its composition. It consists of three parts. The history proper is preceded by a systematical review of the whole of Buddhist literature so far as preserved in Tibet, and it is followed by a systematical catalogue of works, authors and translators of all the literature contained in the Kanjur and Tanjur collections. The first part is of an overwhelming scientifical value. It represents a synthesis of everything which directly or remotely bears the stamp of Buddhism, that synthesis which is also the ultimate aim of the European investigation of that religion. The whole of its literature, sacred and profane, is here reviewed as divided in periods, schools and subject-matter. No one was better qualified for such a task than Budon, for he was one of the redactors of the Kanjur and Tanjur great collections in their final form. As a matter of fact his "History" is but an introduction and a systematical table of contents to the Narthaṅ editions of the Kanjur and Tanjur.
His work has not failed to attract the attention of European scholarship. Wassilieff quotes it in the first volume of his Buddhism, Sarat Candra Das has translated some excerpts out of it. I myself have published a translation in French, in the Muséon 1905 ("Notes de littéature buoddhique. La littérature Yogācāra d'après Bou-ston"),
ston"), of the part devoted to the litterature of the Yogācāra school, and, in English, of the part dealing with the Abhidharma Iitterature of the Sarvāstivādins, included in Prof. Takakusu's work on the Abhidharma Iitterature of the Sarvāstivādins. In the years 1927 and 1928 I have interpreted the work to my pupil E. E. Obermiller making it the subject of our seminary study. He then has made an English translation which was revised by me and is now published, thanks to the kind attention accorded to it by the Heidelberg Society for the Investigation of Buddhist Lore and by its president Professor M. Walleser.
The translation of the first part, now published, was not an easy task, since it consists predominantly of quotations, many of them having the form of mnemonic verse (kārikā's). They had to be identified and their commentaries consulted. With very few exceptions all has been found out by E. E. Obermiller in the Tanjur works. The high merit of this self-denying, absorbing and difficult work will, I have no doubt, be fully appreciated by fellow scholars who have a personal experience of that kind of work.
Budon Rinpoche was a native of Central Tibet. He lived in the years 1290–1364. He consequently belongs to the old school of Tibetan learning, the school which preceded the now dominant Gelugpa sect (the yellow-caps) founded by Tsoṅkhapa. Besides the History he has written many other works. A full block-print edition of all his works in 15 volumes has recently appeared in Lhasa. No copy of it has as yet reached Leningrad. Among his works there is one on logic, Tshad-ma-rnam-ṅes-pai-bsdus-don = Pramāṇa-viniçcaya-piṇḍārtha, with his own commentary. A block-print containing his biography (rnam-thar) is in my possession. It will be analyzed by E. E. Obermiller in the Introduction also dealing with the sources of Tibetan historiography, which will be attached to the translation of the whole work. The Translation is made from the text of the old block-print edition, a copy of which is found in the Asiatic Museum of the Academy of Sciences of the U. S. S. R. (Th. Stcherbatsky, introduction, 3–4)
Notes
- These translations are in need of revision, since there are considerable mistakes in which both translations always agree.
- Bod-Chos-ḥbyuṅ.
Citation | Obermiller, Eugène, trans. History of Buddhism (Chos-hbyung): Part 1, The Jewelry of Scripture. By Bu-ston. With an Introduction by Th. Stcherbatsky. Materialien zur Kunde des Buddhismus 18. Heidelberg, Germany: Harrassowitz, 1931. https://archive.org/details/historyofbuddhismbustonobermillere.part1jewelryofscripture_708_F/mode/2up. |
---|---|