Discover: Difference between revisions

From Buddha-Nature
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker))
 
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker))
Line 1: Line 1:
<h1>Discover Buddha-Nature</h1>
<div class="bnw-panel depth-1 row p-4 mr-0 ml-0 position-relative" style="min-height: 520px;">
<div class="bnw-panel depth-1 row p-4 mr-0 ml-0 position-relative" style="min-height: 520px;">
<div class="bnw-panel-watermark">[[Library|READ<i class="fas fa-caret-right ml-2 mobile-caret"></i>]]</div>
<div class="bnw-panel-watermark">[[Library|READ<i class="fas fa-caret-right ml-2 mobile-caret"></i>]]</div>

Revision as of 15:59, 3 January 2019

Discover Buddha-Nature

What is buddha-nature?
Is buddha-nature emptiness or luminosity?
How did buddha-nature thought develop?
The theory of buddha-nature (tathāgatagarbha, for the most part)--that all sentient beings somehow possess the innate buddhahood or potential to become buddhas--seems to have appeared in India as early as the Second Century CE before spreading to China and Tibet and beyond. The concept seems to have initially been taught as a means of inspiration, offered in response to the seeming nihilism of Madhyamaka emptiness-theory, as well as to the Yogācāra doctrine of Three Natures which restricted buddhahood to only a select few. For this reason scholars mostly agree that buddha-nature theory developed alongside--rather than part of--the two main Indian Mayāyāna Buddhist doctrinal schools, and great thinkers of each have both embraced it and rejected elements of the teaching. Buddha-nature was taught in a handful of early Mahāyāna sūtras such as the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra and the Śrīmālādevīsūtra, and systematized first in the Ratnagotravibhāga, a treatise composed before the year 498 (when it was brought to China). From there it appears to have permeated most Buddhist schools, becoming a significant topic of debate among them.
more
How do I engage with buddha-nature in my practice?
  • Practicing buddha-nature
  • Revealing buddha-nature
  • Talking about buddha-nature