No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* {{i|1.4.1.1 Editions of the Beacon|8}} | * {{i|1.4.1.1 Editions of the Beacon|8}} | ||
* {{i|1.4.2 English Language Sources|11}} | * {{i|1.4.2 English Language Sources|11}} | ||
* {{i|1.5 The Contributions of this Work|14}} | * {{i|1.5 The Contributions of this Work|14}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|2. THE LIFE AND WORKS OF MIPHAM RINPOCHE|19}} | * {{i|2. THE LIFE AND WORKS OF MIPHAM RINPOCHE|19}} | ||
* {{i|2.1 Accounts of Mipham’s Life|22}} | * {{i|2.1 Accounts of Mipham’s Life|22}} | ||
* {{i|2.2 The ''Essential Hagiography'' by mKhan chen Kun bzang dpal ldan|23}}<br> | * {{i|2.2 The ''Essential Hagiography'' by mKhan chen Kun bzang dpal ldan|23}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|3. INDO-TIBETAN BUDDHISM: AN OVERVIEW|41}} | * {{i|3. INDO-TIBETAN BUDDHISM: AN OVERVIEW|41}} | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
* {{i|7. ASCERTAINMENT (''nges pa'') AND CERTAINTY (''nges shes''): Some Conclusions|169}} | * {{i|7. ASCERTAINMENT (''nges pa'') AND CERTAINTY (''nges shes''): Some Conclusions|169}} | ||
* {{i|7.1 Mipham’s Place in Tibetan Philosophy|182}} | * {{i|7.1 Mipham’s Place in Tibetan Philosophy|182}} | ||
* {{i|7.2 Philosophical Texts and Human Relatedness|184}} | * {{i|7.2 Philosophical Texts and Human Relatedness|184}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|8. | |||
* {{i|8. THE TRANSLATION OF THE ''Beacon of Certainty''|187}} | |||
* {{i|8.1 Terminology and Syntax|187}} | * {{i|8.1 Terminology and Syntax|187}} | ||
* {{i|8.2 Technical Terms|188}} | * {{i|8.2 Technical Terms|188}} | ||
* {{i|8.3 Proper Names|192}} | * {{i|8.3 Proper Names|192}} | ||
* {{i|8.4 On the Use and Disuse of Sanskrit Terms|192}} | * {{i|8.4 On the Use and Disuse of Sanskrit Terms|192}} | ||
* {{i|8.5 Outline of the Beacon and Khro shul | * {{i|8.5 Outline of the ''Beacon'' and Khro shul 'jam rdor's Commentary|193}} | ||
* {{i|Abbreviations and Bibliography|193}} | * {{i|Abbreviations and Bibliography|193}} | ||
* {{i|Introduction|194}} | * {{i|Introduction|194}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 1|196}} | * {{i|Topic 1|196}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 2|199}} | * {{i|Topic 2|199}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 3|203}} | * {{i|Topic 3|203}} | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
* {{i|Topic 6|219}} | * {{i|Topic 6|219}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 7|227}} | * {{i|Topic 7|227}} | ||
* {{i|Conclusion|237}} | * {{i|Conclusion|237}}<br><br> | ||
9. | 9. STAINLESS LIGHT: | ||
* {{i|A Commentary on the Beacon | * {{i|A Commentary on the ''Beacon of Certainty''|241}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 1|251}} | * {{i|Topic 1|251}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 2|271}} | * {{i|Topic 2|271}} | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
* {{i|Topic 6|345}} | * {{i|Topic 6|345}} | ||
* {{i|Topic 7|371}} | * {{i|Topic 7|371}} | ||
* {{i|Conclusion|404}} | * {{i|Conclusion|404}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|10. The LION'S ROAR PROCLAIMING EXTRINSIC EMPTINESS|415}}<br><br> | |||
Appendix: Explanatory Diagrams and Tables | Appendix: Explanatory Diagrams and Tables | ||
* {{i|Diagram 1: Conceptuality and True Existence | * {{i|Diagram 1: Conceptuality and True Existence |
Revision as of 16:32, 18 May 2020
For centuries, Dzogchen—a special meditative practice to achieve spontaneous enlightenment—has been misinterpreted by both critics and malinformed meditators as being purely mystical and anti-rational. In the grand spirit of Buddhist debate, 19th century Buddhist philosopher Mipham wrote Beacon of Certainty, a compelling defense of Dzogchen philosophy that employs the very logic it was criticized as lacking. Through lucid and accessible textural translation and penetrating analysis, Pettit presents Mipham as one of Tibet's greatest thinkers. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
Citation | Pettit, John W. Mipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great Perfection. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999. |
---|---|