A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes

Revision as of 14:34, 29 July 2019

Translation of Distinguishing the Three Vows

Book

A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes presents the first English translation of the sDom gsum rab dbye, one of the most famous and controversial doctrinal treatises of Tibetan Buddhism. Written by Sakya Pandita Kunga Gyaltshen (1182–1251), a founder of the Sakya school and one of Tibet’s most learned sages, The Three Codes strongly influenced subsequent religious and intellectual traditions in Tibet—and sparked a number of long-lasting doctrinal and philosophical disputes, some of which persist today.

In The Three Codes, Sakya Pandita discusses the Hinayana, Mahayana, and Tantric vows of Buddhist conduct, which often diverge and contradict each other. He criticizes, on at least one point or another, later practitioners of almost every lineage, including the Kadampa, Kagyupa, and Nyingmapa, for contradicting the original teachings of their own traditions. (Source: SUNY Press)

Citation	Rhoton, Jared Douglas, trans. A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes: Essential Distinctions among the Individual Liberation, Great Vehicle, and Tantric Systems. Edited by Victoria R. M. Scott. SUNY Series in Buddhist Studies. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.

Forewordix
Acknowledgmentsxi
Note on Transcriptionxii
List of Abbreviationsxiii

Part I: Sakya Pandita’s Life and Work
- Introduction3

Part II: A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes
- Prologue39
- Vows of Individual Liberation41
- Vows of the Bodhisattva81
- Vows of the Vajra Vehicle95
- Epilogue199

Part III: Six Letters by Sakya Pandita
- 1. Reply to the Questions of the Translator from Chak205
- 2. Reply to the Questions of the Translator of Lowo225
- 3. A Letter to the Noble-Minded229
- 4. A Letter to the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas of the Ten Directions241
- 5. Reply to the Questions of Dokorwa the Kadampa259
- 6. Reply to the Questions of Namkha Bum the Kadampa267

Appendix A: Gorampa's Outline of A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes273
Appendix B: Transliteration of the Tibetan Text of A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes277

Glossary331
Bibliography337
Index349
About the Cover370

Tibetan Buddhists often describe their religion, and the path of practice it teaches, in terms of "three vows" {sdom gsum)-namely, the three codes of discipline associated with the monastic traditions of the Vinaya, the progressive path of the bodhisattva, and the esoteric precepts of the tantras. Mastery of the three codes implies broad and deep scriptural learning as well as scrupulous attention to every detail of one's personal conduct and deportment. For such mastery to be recognized means the achievement of an authoritative status within the religious community. Hence, in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, the three codes were subject to intensive scrutiny and became a focal point of sustained commentary and debate.

Among the many works of Tibetan masters devoted to the three codes, none has enjoyed more notoriety than A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes {sDom pa gsum pi rab tu dbye ba) by the celebrated author Sakya Pandita Kunga Gyaltshen (or Sapan, n82-I251), presented here in a Western translation for the first time. Not so much a text on the content of the codes themselves as an examination of the many particular questions that relate to the codes-questions that Sapan saw as subject to misunderstanding on the part of his Tibetan contemporaries- The Three Codes has a strongly polemical character. Thus it is easy to see why some readers found the work objectionable in places, others praised it, and all became fascinated by it. Few indigenous Tibetan writings have inspired so abundant and diverse a body of later commentary, commentary that rivals even that on the great Indian Buddhist treatises in its extent.

Whatever one may conclude about the correctness of Sakya Pandita's opinions on any given topic, there can be no doubt that by raising so many questions so trenchantly, Sapan roused Tibetan Buddhists from doctrinal complacency and contributed mightily to the formation of the remarkable intellectual culture that has long distinguished the Buddhist monastic colleges of Tibet. It is for this reason that Sakya Pandita is remembered as the first of the three great thinkers renowned in Central Tibet as emanations of Maiijusri, the Bodhisattva of Wisdom. The two who followed him-the great Dzokchen master Longchen Rabjampa (1308-1364) and the peerless scholar and adept Je Tsongkhapa (1357-I419)-were themselves indebted to Sakya Pandita in myriad ways.

The translation offered here is the work of the American scholar Jared Rhoton (1941-1993), whose premature passing deprived us of one of our finest interpreters of Tibetan Buddhist learning. From his earliest contacts with Tibetan Buddhism and throughout his studies of Tibetan and Sanskrit in India, beginning in the mid-196os, Jared-or Sonam, as he was known to those of us who had the good fortune to meet him in India-was inspired by the Mafijusri tradition stemming from Sakya Pandita. Through his learning and discernment, his wit and humility, Sonam indeed came to exemplify that tradition in an American iteration.

Dr. Rhoton was an excellent and prolific translator of Indian and Tibetan Buddhist texts; nevertheless, his humility and sense of perfection dictated that his published works were few. A Clear Differentiation of the Three.Codes is the most substantial of his writings to appear to date. Its publication is a result of the devoted efforts of his friends, who recognized the great value of his legacy. The vision of Mike Roche in creating the Sapan Fund, the editorial expertise of Victoria Scott, and the Tibetological contribution of Dr. David Jackson have been fundamental in bringing this manuscript into print. Their fine and thoughtful work is a fitting tribute to an admired scholar, and to the bodhisattva who graced him.

MATTHEW T. KAPSTEIN

Editor, SUNY Buddhist Studies Series

Sa skya paN+Di ta. sdom gsum rab dbye.

In sdom pa gsum gyi rab tu dbye ba'i bstan bcos. No publication info.
In sdom gsum rab dbye dang lta ba 'khor 'das dbyer med sogs. No publication info.
In sa skya bka' 'bum, Vol. 12: 1-96. Dehra Dun: Sakya Center, 1992-1993.
In sa skya bka' 'bum ma phyi gsar rnyed phyogs bsgrigs, Vol. 3: 317-480. Lhasa, 1999.
In sdom gsum rab dbye dang sdom gsum gtan 'bebs 'jam dbyangs bla ma'i dgongs rgyan gyi rnam 'grel. Pe cin: mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 2004.
In sa sky paN chen kun dga' rgyal mtshan gyi gsung 'bum, Vol. 2: 1-91. Pe cin: krung go'i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang, 2007.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |FullTextRead=No
 |TextTranslated=Texts/Sdom gsum rab dbye
+|BookEssay=Tibetan Buddhists often describe their religion, and the path of practice it teaches, in terms of "three vows" {sdom gsum)-namely, the three codes of discipline associated with the monastic traditions of the Vinaya, the progressive path of the bodhisattva, and the esoteric precepts of the tantras. Mastery of the three codes implies broad and deep scriptural learning as well as scrupulous attention to every detail of one's personal conduct and deportment. For such mastery to be recognized means the achievement of an authoritative status within the religious community. Hence, in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, the three codes were subject to intensive scrutiny and became a focal point of sustained commentary and debate.
+Among the many works of Tibetan masters devoted to the three codes, none
+has enjoyed more notoriety than A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes {sDom pa gsum pi rab tu dbye ba) by the celebrated author Sakya Pandita Kunga Gyaltshen (or Sapan, n82-I251), presented here in a Western translation for the first time. Not so much a text on the content of the codes themselves as an examination of the many particular questions that relate to the codes-questions that Sapan saw as subject to misunderstanding on the part of his Tibetan contemporaries- The Three Codes has a strongly polemical character. Thus it is easy to see why some readers found the work objectionable in places, others praised it, and all became fascinated by it. Few indigenous Tibetan writings have inspired so abundant and diverse a body of later commentary, commentary that rivals even that on the great Indian Buddhist treatises in its extent.
+Whatever one may conclude about the correctness of Sakya Pandita's opinions
+on any given topic, there can be no doubt that by raising so many questions so
+trenchantly, Sapan roused Tibetan Buddhists from doctrinal complacency and
+contributed mightily to the formation of the remarkable intellectual culture that
+has long distinguished the Buddhist monastic colleges of Tibet. It is for this reason that Sakya Pandita is remembered as the first of the three great thinkers renowned in Central Tibet as emanations of Maiijusri, the Bodhisattva of Wisdom. The two who followed him-the great Dzokchen master Longchen Rabjampa (1308-1364) and the peerless scholar and adept Je Tsongkhapa (1357-I419)-were themselves indebted to Sakya Pandita in myriad ways.
+The translation offered here is the work of the American scholar Jared Rhoton
+(1941-1993), whose premature passing deprived us of one of our finest interpreters of Tibetan Buddhist learning. From his earliest contacts with Tibetan Buddhism and throughout his studies of Tibetan and Sanskrit in India, beginning in the mid-196os, Jared-or Sonam, as he was known to those of us who had the good fortune to meet him in India-was inspired by the Mafijusri tradition stemming from Sakya Pandita. Through his learning and discernment, his wit and humility, Sonam indeed came to exemplify that tradition in an American iteration.
+Dr. Rhoton was an excellent and prolific translator of Indian and Tibetan
+Buddhist texts; nevertheless, his humility and sense of perfection dictated that his published works were few. A Clear Differentiation of the Three.Codes is the most substantial of his writings to appear to date. Its publication is a result of the devoted efforts of his friends, who recognized the great value of his legacy. The vision of Mike Roche in creating the Sapan Fund, the editorial expertise of Victoria Scott, and the Tibetological contribution of Dr. David Jackson have been fundamental in bringing this manuscript into print. Their fine and thoughtful work is a fitting tribute to an admired scholar, and to the bodhisattva who graced him.
+MATTHEW T. KAPSTEIN
+Editor, SUNY Buddhist Studies Series
 |BookToc=*{{i|Foreword|ix}}
 *{{i|Acknowledgments|xi}}