No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
|BookToc=* {{i|Foreword by His Holiness Penor Rinpoche|''ix''}} | |||
* {{i|Acknowledgments|''xi''}} | |||
* {{i|Source Abbreviations|''xv''}} | |||
* {{i|Annotations, Diacritics, and Transcription|''xvii''}} | |||
* {{i|1. INTRODUCTION|1}} | |||
* {{i|1.1 Mipham Rinpoche and the Beacon ofCertainty|1}} | |||
* {{i|1.2 Outline|2}} | |||
* {{i|1.3 The Beacon ofCertainty: Context and Significance|2}} | |||
* {{i|1.3.1 Dialectical Philosophy and the Great Perfection|2}} | |||
* {{i|1.3.2 The Beacons Purpose|5}} | |||
* {{i|1.3.3 The Beacons Comparative Method|6}} | |||
* {{i|1.4 Methods and Sources|7}} | |||
* {{i|1.4.1 Tibetan Language Sources|8}} | |||
* {{i|1.4.1.1 Editions of the Beacon|8}} | |||
* {{i|1.4.2 English Language Sources|11}} | |||
* {{i|1.5 The Contributions of this Work|14}} | |||
* {{i|2. THE LIFE AND WORKS OF MIPHAM RINPOCHE|19}} | |||
* {{i|2.1 Accounts of Mipham’s Life|22}} | |||
* {{i|2.2 The Essential Hagiography<br> | |||
by mKhan chen Kun bzang dpal ldan|23}} | |||
* {{i|3. Indo-Tibetan Buddhism: An Overview|41}} | |||
* {{i|3.1 Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Buddhism|41}} | |||
* {{i|3.2 Hinayäna and Mahäyäna|42}} | |||
* {{i|3.3 Important Teachings of Mahäyäna Scriptures|45}} | |||
* {{i|3.3.1 Prajnäpäramitä|45}} | |||
* {{i|3.3.2 The Samdhinirmocana and the “Essence Sütras”|47}} | |||
* {{i|3.3.3 Sources for Buddhist Hermeneutics|49}} | |||
* {{i|3.4 Traditions of Indian Madhyamaka|51}} | |||
* {{i|3.4.1 Origins of Prasahgika and Svätantrika Madhyamaka|52}} | |||
* {{i|3.4.2 Yogäcära and the Yogäcära Madhyamaka Synthesis|55}} | |||
* {{i|3.4.3 Madhyamaka and Pramäna|57}} | |||
* {{i|3.5 Vajrayäna: Buddhist Tantra|60}} | |||
* {{i|3.5.1 Indian Origins|60}} | |||
* {{i|3.5.2 Philosophical Dimensions of Tantra|62}} | |||
* {{i|3.5.3 Styles ofTantric Practice|68}} | |||
* {{i|4. Tibetan Buddhist Traditions and the Great Perfection|71}} | |||
* {{i|4.1 The Yarlung Empire and the Introduction of Buddhism|72}} | |||
* {{i|4.2 Early Nyingma Teachers and Texts|74}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.1 The Treasure Tradition|76}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.2 The Great Perfection|77}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.2.1 Origins|77}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.2.2 The View of the Great Perfection|77}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.2.3 The Three Classes of Great Perfection|79}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.24 Great Perfection in Practice|80}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.3 The Great Perfection | |||
in Comparative Philosophical Texts|81}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.3.1 Ch’an and the Great Perfection | |||
in the bSam gtan mig sgron|82}} | |||
* {{i|4.2.3.2 Other Early Doxographies|84}} | |||
* {{i|4.3 The New Translation Period | |||
and the Nyingma Tradition|86}} | |||
* {{i|4.3.1 Rong zom Pandita|88}} | |||
* {{i|4.3.2 The Rise of Scholasticism|91}} | |||
* {{i|4.3.3 Klong chen rab ’byams|92}} | |||
* {{i|4.3.4 Nyingma Monasticism | |||
and the Ecumenical Movement (ris med)|97}} | |||
* {{i|4.3.5 A Nyingma Philosophy?|98}} | |||
* {{i|5. Philosophical Distinctions of Mipham’s Thought|101}} | |||
* {{i|5.1 The Gelug Philosophical Tradition|101}} | |||
* {{i|5.2 Theory, Practice, and Ultimate Reality|104}} | |||
* {{i|5.3 Valid Cognition and Philosophical Analysis|107}} | |||
* {{i|5.4 The Philosophy of Extrinsic Emptiness|111}} | |||
* {{i|5.5 Mipham’s Interpretation of Extrinsic Emptiness | |||
and Tathägatagarbha|114}} | |||
* {{i|5.6 Mipham’s Position on the Tathägatagarbha|117}} | |||
* {{i|6. The Beacon ofCertainty|125}} | |||
* {{i|6.1 Recapitulation of Earlier Discussions|125}} | |||
* {{i|6.2 The Topics of the Beacon|126}} | |||
* {{i|6.2.1 The Beacon and Tsongkhapa’s | |||
Eight Great Difficult Points|128}} | |||
* {{i|6.2.2 Some Observations on Topics 5, 6, and 7|130}} | |||
* {{i|6.3 View, Meditative Practice, | |||
and Ultimate Reality in the Beacon|133}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.I Anupaksas and Pürvapaksas: An Overview|133}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.1.1 Essential Issues and Arguments in Topics 1, 3, and 4|134}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.1.2 Go ram pa’s Analysis ofView | |||
and Meditation in the TSB|136}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.1.2.1 Go ram pa on the Ultimate View|137}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.1.2.2 Go ram pa on Meditative Practice |139}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.2 Topic 1: Philosophical View and Rational Negation|141}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.2.1 Tsongkhapa on the Negandum and Its Substratum|141}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.2.2 Mipham’s Theory of Negation|144}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.2.2.1 Negation and the Definition of the Ultimate|144}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.2.2.2 Mipham’s Analysis of Negation in the MAZL|146}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.2.2.3 Mipham’s Theory of the Ultimate: | |||
Gnosis and Coalescence|151}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.3 Topics 3 and 4: Tsongkhapa and Mipham | |||
on Modal Apprehension and Analytical Reasoning|157}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.3.1 Tsongkhapa on the Role | |||
of Conceptuality in Meditation|157}} | |||
* {{i|6.3.3.1.1 Yon tan rgya mtsho | |||
on Modal Apprehension and Analysis|160}} | |||
* {{i|7. Ascertainment (nges pa) and Certainty (nges shes): | |||
Some Conclusions|169}} | |||
* {{i|7.1 Mipham’s Place in Tibetan Philosophy|182}} | |||
* {{i|7.2 Philosophical Texts and Human Relatedness|184}} | |||
* {{i|8. The Translation of the Beacon of Certainty|187}} | |||
* {{i|8.1 Terminology and Syntax|187}} | |||
* {{i|8.2 Technical Terms|188}} | |||
* {{i|8.3 Proper Names|192}} | |||
* {{i|8.4 On the Use and Disuse of Sanskrit Terms|192}} | |||
* {{i|8.5 Outline of the Beacon and Khro shul ’jam rdor’s Commentary|193}} | |||
* {{i|Abbreviations and Bibliography|193}} | |||
* {{i|Introduction|194}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 1|196}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 2|199}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 3|203}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 4|208}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 5|214}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 6|219}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 7|227}} | |||
* {{i|Conclusion|237}} | |||
9. Stainless Light: | |||
* {{i|A Commentary on the Beacon ofCertainty|241}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 1|251}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 2|271}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 3|291}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 4|306}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 5|329}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 6|345}} | |||
* {{i|Topic 7|371}} | |||
* {{i|Conclusion|404}} | |||
* {{i|10. The Lion’s Roar Proclaiming Extrinsic Emptiness|415}} | |||
Appendix: Explanatory Diagrams and Tables | |||
* {{i|Diagram 1: Conceptuality and True Existence | |||
According to Go ram pa and Mipham|429}} | |||
* {{i|Diagram 2: Conceptuality and True Existence | |||
According to Tsongkhapa|430}} | |||
* {{i|Table 1: Mipham’s System of Four Pramânas|431}} | |||
* {{i|Table 2: Traditions, Two-truth Paradigms, and Their Sources|432}} | |||
* {{i|Table y Pramânas and Their Paradigms ofTruth and Negation|433}} | |||
* {{i|Table 4: The Role ofAscertainment and Conceptuality | |||
According to Mipham and Gelug Philosophers|434}} | |||
* {{i|Notes to Tables|435}} | |||
* {{i|Glossary of Technical Terms|439}} | |||
* {{i|Notes|461}} | |||
* {{i|Bibliography of Works Consulted|533}} | |||
* {{i|Index|557}} | |||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 10:24, 7 April 2020
For centuries, Dzogchen—a special meditative practice to achieve spontaneous enlightenment—has been misinterpreted by both critics and malinformed meditators as being purely mystical and anti-rational. In the grand spirit of Buddhist debate, 19th century Buddhist philosopher Mipham wrote Beacon of Certainty, a compelling defense of Dzogchen philosophy that employs the very logic it was criticized as lacking. Through lucid and accessible textural translation and penetrating analysis, Pettit presents Mipham as one of Tibet's greatest thinkers. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
Citation | Pettit, John W. Mipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great Perfection. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999. |
---|---|