No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* {{i|3.4.1 Origins of Prāsaṅgika and Svātantrika Madhyamaka|52}} | * {{i|3.4.1 Origins of Prāsaṅgika and Svātantrika Madhyamaka|52}} | ||
* {{i|3.4.2 Yogācāra and the Yogācāra Madhyamaka Synthesis|55}} | * {{i|3.4.2 Yogācāra and the Yogācāra Madhyamaka Synthesis|55}} | ||
* {{i|3.4.3 Madhyamaka and Pramāṇa|57}} | * {{i|3.4.3 Madhyamaka and Pramāṇa|57}} | ||
* {{i|3.5 Vajrayāna: Buddhist Tantra|60}} | * {{i|3.5 Vajrayāna: Buddhist Tantra|60}} | ||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
* {{i|3.5.2 Philosophical Dimensions of Tantra|62}} | * {{i|3.5.2 Philosophical Dimensions of Tantra|62}} | ||
* {{i|3.5.3 Styles of Tantric Practice|68}} | * {{i|3.5.3 Styles of Tantric Practice|68}} | ||
* {{i|4. Tibetan Buddhist Traditions and the Great Perfection|71}} | * {{i|4. Tibetan Buddhist Traditions and the Great Perfection|71}} | ||
* {{i|4.1 The Yarlung Empire and the Introduction of Buddhism|72}} | * {{i|4.1 The Yarlung Empire and the Introduction of Buddhism|72}} |
Revision as of 16:14, 18 May 2020
For centuries, Dzogchen—a special meditative practice to achieve spontaneous enlightenment—has been misinterpreted by both critics and malinformed meditators as being purely mystical and anti-rational. In the grand spirit of Buddhist debate, 19th century Buddhist philosopher Mipham wrote Beacon of Certainty, a compelling defense of Dzogchen philosophy that employs the very logic it was criticized as lacking. Through lucid and accessible textural translation and penetrating analysis, Pettit presents Mipham as one of Tibet's greatest thinkers. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
Citation | Pettit, John W. Mipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great Perfection. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999. |
---|---|