No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* {{i|Acknowledgments|''xi''}} | * {{i|Acknowledgments|''xi''}} | ||
* {{i|Source Abbreviations|''xv''}} | * {{i|Source Abbreviations|''xv''}} | ||
* {{i|Annotations, Diacritics, and Transcription|''xvii''}}<br> | * {{i|Annotations, Diacritics, and Transcription|''xvii''}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|1. INTRODUCTION|1}} | * {{i|1. INTRODUCTION|1}} | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* {{i|1.4.1.1 Editions of the Beacon|8}} | * {{i|1.4.1.1 Editions of the Beacon|8}} | ||
* {{i|1.4.2 English Language Sources|11}} | * {{i|1.4.2 English Language Sources|11}} | ||
* {{i|1.5 The Contributions of this Work|14}}<br> | * {{i|1.5 The Contributions of this Work|14}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|2. THE LIFE AND WORKS OF MIPHAM RINPOCHE|19}} | * {{i|2. THE LIFE AND WORKS OF MIPHAM RINPOCHE|19}} | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
* {{i|3.5.1 Indian Origins|60}} | * {{i|3.5.1 Indian Origins|60}} | ||
* {{i|3.5.2 Philosophical Dimensions of Tantra|62}} | * {{i|3.5.2 Philosophical Dimensions of Tantra|62}} | ||
* {{i|3.5.3 Styles of Tantric Practice|68}}<br> | * {{i|3.5.3 Styles of Tantric Practice|68}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|4. TIBETAN BUDDHIST TRADITIONS AND THE GREAT PERFECTION|71}} | * {{i|4. TIBETAN BUDDHIST TRADITIONS AND THE GREAT PERFECTION|71}} | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
* {{i|4.3.3 Klong chen rab 'byams|92}} | * {{i|4.3.3 Klong chen rab 'byams|92}} | ||
* {{i|4.3.4 Nyingma Monasticism and the Ecumenical Movement (''ris med'')|97}} | * {{i|4.3.4 Nyingma Monasticism and the Ecumenical Movement (''ris med'')|97}} | ||
* {{i|4.3.5 A Nyingma Philosophy?|98}} | * {{i|4.3.5 A Nyingma Philosophy?|98}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|5. | |||
* {{i|5. PHILOSOPHICAL DISTINCTIONS OF MIPHAM'S THOUGHT|101}} | |||
* {{i|5.1 The Gelug Philosophical Tradition|101}} | * {{i|5.1 The Gelug Philosophical Tradition|101}} | ||
* {{i|5.2 Theory, Practice, and Ultimate Reality|104}} | * {{i|5.2 Theory, Practice, and Ultimate Reality|104}} |
Revision as of 16:18, 18 May 2020
For centuries, Dzogchen—a special meditative practice to achieve spontaneous enlightenment—has been misinterpreted by both critics and malinformed meditators as being purely mystical and anti-rational. In the grand spirit of Buddhist debate, 19th century Buddhist philosopher Mipham wrote Beacon of Certainty, a compelling defense of Dzogchen philosophy that employs the very logic it was criticized as lacking. Through lucid and accessible textural translation and penetrating analysis, Pettit presents Mipham as one of Tibet's greatest thinkers. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
Citation | Pettit, John W. Mipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great Perfection. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999. |
---|---|