No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
* {{i|6.3.3.1.1 Yon tan rgya mtsho on Modal Apprehension and Analysis|160}}<br><br> | * {{i|6.3.3.1.1 Yon tan rgya mtsho on Modal Apprehension and Analysis|160}}<br><br> | ||
* {{i|7. ASCERTAINMENT (''nges pa'') AND CERTAINTY (''nges shes''): | * {{i|7. ASCERTAINMENT (''nges pa'') AND CERTAINTY (''nges shes''):<br> SOME CONCLUSIONS|169}} | ||
* {{i|7.1 Mipham’s Place in Tibetan Philosophy|182}} | * {{i|7.1 Mipham’s Place in Tibetan Philosophy|182}} | ||
* {{i|7.2 Philosophical Texts and Human Relatedness|184}}<br><br> | * {{i|7.2 Philosophical Texts and Human Relatedness|184}}<br><br> |
Revision as of 16:33, 18 May 2020
For centuries, Dzogchen—a special meditative practice to achieve spontaneous enlightenment—has been misinterpreted by both critics and malinformed meditators as being purely mystical and anti-rational. In the grand spirit of Buddhist debate, 19th century Buddhist philosopher Mipham wrote Beacon of Certainty, a compelling defense of Dzogchen philosophy that employs the very logic it was criticized as lacking. Through lucid and accessible textural translation and penetrating analysis, Pettit presents Mipham as one of Tibet's greatest thinkers. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
Citation | Pettit, John W. Mipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great Perfection. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999. |
---|---|