No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
“Śākya Chogden speaks of a conditioned and an unconditioned as well as a seeming and an ultimate tathāgatagarbha. He holds that even the ultimate tathāgata heart is impermanent because it is a functional entity, which is ceasing moment by moment. On the other hand, he says, this does not contradict its being explained as permanent in other contexts, when having in mind the permanence in terms of continuity.” - Karl Brunnhölzl | “Śākya Chogden speaks of a conditioned and an unconditioned as well as a seeming and an ultimate tathāgatagarbha. He holds that even the ultimate tathāgata heart is impermanent because it is a functional entity, which is ceasing moment by moment. On the other hand, he says, this does not contradict its being explained as permanent in other contexts, when having in mind the permanence in terms of continuity.” - Karl Brunnhölzl | ||
[[Books/When the Clouds Part/Different Ways of Explaining the Meaning of ''Tathāgatagarbha''|Read more about Different Ways of Explaining the Meaning of ''Tathāgatagarbha'']] by Karl Brunnhölzl. | |||
::Explanations of Tathāgatagarbha in Indian Texts | |||
::Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That Is a Nonimplicative Negation | |||
::Tathāgatagarbha as Mind’s Luminous Nature | |||
::Tathāgatagarbha as the Ālaya-Consciousness | |||
::Tathāgatagarbha as a Sentient Being | |||
::Tathāgatagarbha as the Dharmakāya, Suchness, the Disposition, and Nonconceptuality | |||
::Tibetan Assertions on Tathāgatagarbha | |||
}} | }} |