No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
:In respective order there are four reasons for
:In respective order there are four reasons for
:these four aspects being inconceivable. They are:  
:these four aspects being inconceivable. They are:  
<h6>Holmes (1999) <ref>Holmes, Ken & Katia. Maitreya on Buddha Nature. Scotland: Altea Publishing, 1999.</ref></h6>
:The potential for the rare and sublime
:is the domain of wisdom of the omniscient.
:In respective order, there are four reasons why
:these four aspects are inconceivable:


<h6>Fuchs (2000) <ref>Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.</ref></h6>
<h6>Fuchs (2000) <ref>Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.</ref></h6>

Revision as of 14:08, 21 March 2019

Ratnagotravibhāga Root Verse I.24

Verse I.24 Variations

गोत्रं रत्नत्रयस्यास्य विषयः सर्वदर्शिनाम्
चतुर्विधः स चाचिन्त्यश्चतुर्भिः कारणैः क्रमात्
gotraṃ ratnatrayasyāsya viṣayaḥ sarvadarśinām
caturvidhaḥ sa cācintyaścaturbhiḥ kāraṇaiḥ kramāt
E. H. Johnston as input by the University of the West.[1]
།དཀོན་མཆོག་གསུམ་པོ་འདི་ཡི་རིགས།
།ཐམས་ཅད་གཟིགས་པ་རྣམས་ཀྱི་ཡུལ།
།དེ་ཡང་རྣམ་བཞི་གོ་རིམས་བཞིན།
།རྒྱུ་བཞི་ཡིས་ནི་བསམ་མི་ཁྱབ།
The disposition of the three jewels
Is the object of those who see everything.
It is fourfold and is inconceivable
For four reasons in due order
La filiation spirituelle des Trois Joyaux
Est l’objet de ceux qui voient tout.
Les quatre points sont inconcevables
Pour quatre raisons. Respectivement :

RGVV Commentary on Verse I.24

Other English translations

Listed by date of publication
Obermiller (1931) [3]
The source of these 3 Jewels
Is accessible only to the Omniscient;
It has four varieties
And is inconceivable for four motives, respectively.
Takasaki (1966) [4]
The Germ of these Three Jewels
Is the sphere of the Omniscience,
And it is inconceivable in fourfold
For four reasons, respectively.
Holmes (1985) [5]
The potential for these three rare and supreme gems
is the domain of knowledge of the omniscient.
In respective order there are four reasons for
these four aspects being inconceivable. They are:
Holmes (1999) [6]
The potential for the rare and sublime
is the domain of wisdom of the omniscient.
In respective order, there are four reasons why
these four aspects are inconceivable:
Fuchs (2000) [7]
The disposition of the Three Rare and Sublime Ones
is the object [of vision] of those who see everything.
Furthermore, these four aspects in the given order
are inconceivable, for the following four reasons:

Textual sources

Commentaries on this verse

Academic notes

  1. Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input
  2. Brunnhölzl, Karl. When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.
  3. Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.
  4. Takasaki, Jikido. A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.
  5. Holmes, Ken & Katia. The Changeless Nature. Eskdalemuir, Scotland: Karma Drubgyud Darjay Ling, 1985.
  6. Holmes, Ken & Katia. Maitreya on Buddha Nature. Scotland: Altea Publishing, 1999.
  7. Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.