No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Media | {{Media | ||
|TilePhoto=File:The Debate over Buddha Nature.png | |||
|MediaEventPage=Karl Brunnhölzl Interview on Buddha-Nature | |MediaEventPage=Karl Brunnhölzl Interview on Buddha-Nature | ||
|MediaNumberInEvent=5 | |MediaNumberInEvent=5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 2 January 2020
The Debate over Buddha-Nature by Karl Brunnhölzl - 7 of 13
Video
Video
Karl Brunnhölzl discusses why there has historically been such debate over the teaching of buddha-nature. He suggests that one of the main points of contention has not been whether buddha-nature is considered a Buddhist teaching or not. Rather, the debate has centered around interpretations of what buddha-nature actually means or implies. Does it imply a truly existent nature, or something that has always been there from the beginning? Or does it resemble something more akin to a nonaffirming negation that implies that buddha-nature is ultimately empty. Brunnhölzl explains that many Tibetan thinkers fall somewhere between these two poles.
About the video
| Featuring | Karl Brunnhölzl |
|---|---|
| Creator | Tsadra Foundation |
| Director | Perman, M. |
| Producer | Tsadra Foundation |
| Event | Karl Brunnhölzl Interview on Buddha-Nature (3 December 2018, Tsadra Foundation, Boulder) |
| Related Website | Buddha-Nature |
| Creation Date | 3 December 2018 |
| Citation | Brunnhölzl, Karl. “The Debate over Buddha-Nature.” Interview by Marcus Perman. Tsadra Foundation Research Department, December 3, 2018. Video, 4:21. https://youtu.be/jMV3uHDWg_o. |
